Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24296535›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2014

Long non-coding RNAs: new players in cell differentiation and development.

Alessandro Fatica, Irene Bozzoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,751 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,751citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,751 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The history and function of a circular RNA.Nature communications · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1,691 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro FaticaDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Irene Bozzoni1] Department of Biology and Biotechnology "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy. [2] Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology of the National Research Council, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy. [3] Istituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy. [4] Center for Life Nano Science @Sapienza, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Funding

Telethon GGP11149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes of multicellular organisms are characterized by the pervasive expression of different types of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) belong to a novel heterogeneous class of ncRNAs that includes thousands of different species. lncRNAs have crucial roles in gene expression control during both developmental and differentiation processes, and the number of lncRNA species increases in genomes of developmentally complex organisms, which highlights the importance of RNA-based levels of control in the evolution of multicellular organisms. In this Review, we describe the function of lncRNAs in developmental processes, such as in dosage compensation, genomic imprinting, cell differentiation and organogenesis, with a particular emphasis on mammalian development.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationCytoplasmDosage Compensation, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomic ImprintingMammalsModels, MolecularMusclesOrganogenesisRNA, Long NoncodingSpecies SpecificityRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID24296535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.