Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24296066›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2014

Mechanistic evaluation of the transfection barriers involved in lipid-mediated gene delivery: interplay between nanostructure and composition.

D Pozzi, C Marchini, F Cardarelli, F Salomone, S Coppola, M Montani, M Elexpuru Zabaleta, M A Digman, E Gratton, V Colapicchioni and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Lipid Nanoparticles for Ocular Gene Delivery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D PozziDepartment of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy.
C MarchiniDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, 62032 Camerino, MC, Italy.
F CardarelliCenter for Nanotechnology Innovation @NEST, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
F SalomoneCenter for Nanotechnology Innovation @NEST, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy; NEST, Scuola Normale Superiore and Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
S CoppolaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy; Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via A. Borelli, 50, 00161 Rome, Italy.
M MontaniDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, 62032 Camerino, MC, Italy.
M Elexpuru ZabaletaDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, 62032 Camerino, MC, Italy.
M A DigmanLaboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 3120 Natural Sciences 2, Irvine, CA 92697-2715, USA.
E GrattonLaboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 3120 Natural Sciences 2, Irvine, CA 92697-2715, USA.
V ColapicchioniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy.
G CaraccioloDepartment of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: giulio.caracciolo@uniroma1.it.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità di Camerino · ITFluor (United States) · USItalian Institute of Technology · IT

Funding

Uncover Strategies Used By Biological SystemsP50GM076516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARDWELL, LEE S · 2007 to 2016
$25.1M
YEAST RIBOSOMAL STALK COMPOSITION IN VIVO BY TWO-PHOTON FCS AND PCH ANALYSISP41RR003155 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GRATTON, ENRICO · 1986 to 2011
$14.9M
TRD4: Phasor analysisP41GM103540 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GRATTON, ENRICO · 2012 to 2020
$12.5M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P41RR003155NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR003155NIGMS NIH HHS 5P50GM076516NIGMS NIH HHS 8P41GM103540NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103540NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present a quantitative mechanism-based investigation aimed at comparing the cell uptake, intracellular trafficking, endosomal escape and final fate of lipoplexes and lipid-protamine/deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (LPD) nanoparticles (NPs) in living Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. As a model, two lipid formulations were used for comparison. The first formulation is made of the cationic lipid 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP) and the zwitterionic lipid dioleoylphosphocholine (DOPC), while the second mixture is made of the cationic 3β-[N-(N,N-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoyl] cholesterol (DC-Chol) and the zwitterionic helper lipid dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE). Our findings indicate that lipoplexes are efficiently taken up through fluid-phase macropinocytosis, while a less efficient uptake of LPD NPs occurs through a combination of both macropinocytosis and clathrin-dependent pathways. Inside the cell, both lipoplexes and LPD NPs are actively transported towards the cell nucleus, as quantitatively addressed by spatio-temporal image correlation spectroscopy (STICS). For each lipid formulation, LPD NPs escape from endosomes more efficiently than lipoplexes. When cells were treated with DOTAP-DOPC-containing systems the majority of the DNA was trapped in the lysosome compartment, suggesting that extensive lysosomal degradation was the rate-limiting factors in DOTAP-DOPC-mediated transfection. On the other side, escape from endosomes is large for DC-Chol-DOPE-containing systems most likely due to DOPE and cholesterol-like molecules, which are able to destabilize the endosomal membrane. The lipid-dependent and structure-dependent enhancement of transfection activity suggests that DNA is delivered to the nucleus synergistically: the process requires both the membrane-fusogenic activity of the nanocarrier envelope and the employment of lipid species with intrinsic endosomal rupture ability.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCationsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusDNAEndosomesFlow CytometryGenetic TherapyLipidsLiposomesNanocompositesNanostructuresPinocytosisProtaminesCationsDNALipidsLiposomesProtaminesGene deliveryLipid nanoparticleLipoplexTransfection barrier

Identifiers

PMID24296066
PMCPMC3940149
OpenAlexW2169684454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.