Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24295852›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2014

EGF receptor trafficking: consequences for signaling and cancer.

Alejandra Tomas, Clare E Futter, Emily R Eden

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 449 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
449citing papers in PubMed
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

449 citing papers in PubMed, 790 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

389 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandra TomasUniversity College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Clare E FutterUniversity College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Emily R EdenUniversity College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK. Electronic address: e.eden@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801878Medical Research Council G1001684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ligand-stimulated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been extensively studied in the analysis of molecular mechanisms regulating endocytic traffic and the role of that traffic in signal transduction. Although such studies have largely focused on mitogenic signaling and dysregulated traffic in tumorigenesis, there is growing interest in the potential role of EGFR traffic in cell survival and the consequent response to cancer therapy. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of molecular mechanisms regulating ligand-stimulated EGFR activation, internalization, and post-endocytic sorting. The role of EGFR overexpression/mutation and new modulators of EGFR traffic in cancer and the response to cancer therapeutics are also discussed. Finally, we speculate on the relationship between EGFR traffic and cell survival.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsEndocytosisErbB ReceptorsGRB2 Adaptor ProteinHumansMultivesicular BodiesMutationNeoplasmsProtein TransportProteolysisUbiquitinationAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsGRB2 Adaptor ProteinGRB2 protein, humanantineoplastic therapyendocytosisepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)oncogenestraffickingubiquitination

Identifiers

PMID24295852
PMCPMC3884125
OpenAlexW2024502310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.