Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24295612›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2014

Developing a CKD registry in primary care: provider attitudes and input.

Dannielle McBride, Daniel Dohan, Margaret A Handley, Neil R Powe, Delphine S Tuot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Impact of a Primary Care CKD Registry in a US Public Safety-Net Health Care Delivery System: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Chronic kidney disease care in the US safety net.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dannielle McBrideJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Daniel DohanPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Margaret A HandleyDivision of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Neil R PoweDivision of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Delphine S TuotDivision of Nephrology at San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: delphine.tuot@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
Engaging University of California Stakeholders for Biorespository ResearchUL1TR000004 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$78.0M
Academic Training Program in NephrologyT32DK007219 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HSU, CHI-YUAN · 1986 to 2022
$7.3M
CKD awareness and self-management: Interventions for Safety-Net PatientsK23DK094850 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TUOT, DELPHINE · 2012 to 2015
$754k
Health IT Enhanced for CKD in Safety-Net Primary CareR34DK093992 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI POWE, NEIL R. · 2011 to 2013
$686k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000004NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK094850NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK094850NIDDK NIH HHS R34 DK093992NIDDK NIH HHS R34DK093992NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic disease registries have been successful at promoting the delivery of guideline-concordant primary care for patients with diabetes and hypertension, but not for chronic kidney disease (CKD). To understand whether a registry could be designed to improve CKD management in primary care, we explored primary care provider attitudes about the benefits (or lack thereof) of a CKD registry compared with other chronic diseases and the key facilitators of successfully implementing a CKD registry in safety-net primary care. STUDY

designQualitative, using semistructured interviews. SETTING &

participantsWe conducted and recorded semistructured 1-hour interviews with medical directors and quality improvement champions from safety-net adult primary care clinics in San Francisco. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Recordings were transcribed and analyzed using a grounded theory approach until thematic saturation was achieved.

results20 primary care providers were interviewed. 4 themes relevant to the development of a successful CKD registry for safety-net primary care were identified: (1) provider beliefs that a CKD registry could aid in the delivery of team-based high-quality CKD care; (2) clinic workflow redesign and staffing are key facilitators to successful implementation of a CKD registry; (3) unique complexities of CKD, such as varying etiologies, may limit the use of a CKD registry by nonphysicians; and (4) a CKD registry is aligned with current primary care priorities and health care delivery strategies. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and reliance on clinician leaders within one health care delivery system.

conclusionsA CKD registry directed at the entire health care team, with the functionality to track, standardize, and enhance CKD care through decision support, has the potential to improve the management of CKD in safety-net primary care settings. These data directly informed the development of a CKD registry in these settings in San Francisco.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicDecision Support TechniquesDisease ManagementFemaleHealth PrioritiesHumansMaleProgram Developmentchronic disease managementchronic kidney disease (CKD) awarenessChronic kidney disease (CKD) registrydecision supportguideline implementationhealth information technology (IT)primary caresafety net

Identifiers

PMID24295612
PMCPMC3969392
OpenAlexW2121052306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.