Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24295509›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2013

Development of clinical decision rules to predict recurrent shock in dengue.

Nguyen Tien Huy, Nguyen Thanh Hong Thao, Tran Thi Ngoc Ha, Nguyen Thi Phuong Lan, Phan Thi Thanh Nga, Tran Thi Thuy, Ha Manh Tuan, Cao Thi Phi Nga, Vo Van Tuong, Tran Van Dat and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic Models in Patients with Dengue: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nguyen Tien Huy
Nguyen Thanh Hong Thao
Tran Thi Ngoc Ha
Nguyen Thi Phuong Lan
Phan Thi Thanh Nga
Tran Thi Thuy
Ha Manh Tuan
Cao Thi Phi Nga
Vo Van Tuong
Tran Van Dat
Vu Thi Que Huong
Juntra Karbwang
Kenji Hirayama
Institut Pasteur in Ho Chi Minh City · VNNagasaki University · JPChildren's Hospital 1 · VNChildren's Hospital 2 · VNHo Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMortality from dengue infection is mostly due to shock. Among dengue patients with shock, approximately 30% have recurrent shock that requires a treatment change. Here, we report development of a clinical rule for use during a patient's first shock episode to predict a recurrent shock episode.

methodsThe study was conducted in Center for Preventive Medicine in Vinh Long province and the Children's Hospital No. 2 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We included 444 dengue patients with shock, 126 of whom had recurrent shock (28%). Univariate and multivariate analyses and a preprocessing method were used to evaluate and select 14 clinical and laboratory signs recorded at shock onset. Five variables (admission day, purpura/ecchymosis, ascites/pleural effusion, blood platelet count and pulse pressure) were finally trained and validated by a 10-fold validation strategy with 10 times of repetition, using a logistic regression model.

resultsThe results showed that shorter admission day (fewer days prior to admission), purpura/ecchymosis, ascites/pleural effusion, low platelet count and narrow pulse pressure were independently associated with recurrent shock. Our logistic prediction model was capable of predicting recurrent shock when compared to the null method (P < 0.05) and was not outperformed by other prediction models. Our final scoring rule provided relatively good accuracy (AUC, 0.73; sensitivity and specificity, 68%). Score points derived from the logistic prediction model revealed identical accuracy with AUCs at 0.73. Using a cutoff value greater than -154.5, our simple scoring rule showed a sensitivity of 68.3% and a specificity of 68.2%.

conclusionsOur simple clinical rule is not to replace clinical judgment, but to help clinicians predict recurrent shock during a patient's first dengue shock episode.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAscitesDengueEcchymosisHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsPlatelet CountPleural EffusionPulsePurpuraRecurrenceShockTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24295509
PMCPMC4057383
OpenAlexW2005093325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.