ArticleCritical care (London, England)2013
Development of clinical decision rules to predict recurrent shock in dengue.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Models in Patients with Dengue: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic Indicators for the Early Prediction of Severe Dengue Infection: A Retrospective Study in a University Hospital in Thailand.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- The compensatory reserve index predicts recurrent shock in patients with severe dengue.BMC medicine · 2022Observational
- Brazilian Dengue Virus Type 2-Associated Renal Involvement in a Murine Model: Outcomes after Infection by Two Lineages of the Asian/American Genotype.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Dengue epidemic in a non-endemic zone of Bangladesh: Clinical and laboratory profiles of patients.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Validation of Decision Groups in Patients with Dengue Fever: A Study during 2015 Outbreak in Taiwan.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018Article
- A retrospective cohort study to predict severe dengue in Honduran patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Article
- Criteria of "persistent vomiting" in the WHO 2009 warning signs for dengue case classification.Tropical medicine and health · 2016Article
- Dynamic Measurement of Hemodynamic Parameters and Cardiac Preload in Adults with Dengue: A Prospective Observational Study.PloS one · 2016Observational
- Development of a Simple Clinical Risk Score for Early Prediction of Severe Dengue in Adult Patients.PloS one · 2016Article
- A Prognostic Model for Development of Profound Shock among Children Presenting with Dengue Shock Syndrome.PloS one · 2015Observational
- Dengue therapeutics, chemoprophylaxis, and allied tools: state of the art and future directions.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMortality from dengue infection is mostly due to shock. Among dengue patients with shock, approximately 30% have recurrent shock that requires a treatment change. Here, we report development of a clinical rule for use during a patient's first shock episode to predict a recurrent shock episode.
methodsThe study was conducted in Center for Preventive Medicine in Vinh Long province and the Children's Hospital No. 2 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We included 444 dengue patients with shock, 126 of whom had recurrent shock (28%). Univariate and multivariate analyses and a preprocessing method were used to evaluate and select 14 clinical and laboratory signs recorded at shock onset. Five variables (admission day, purpura/ecchymosis, ascites/pleural effusion, blood platelet count and pulse pressure) were finally trained and validated by a 10-fold validation strategy with 10 times of repetition, using a logistic regression model.
resultsThe results showed that shorter admission day (fewer days prior to admission), purpura/ecchymosis, ascites/pleural effusion, low platelet count and narrow pulse pressure were independently associated with recurrent shock. Our logistic prediction model was capable of predicting recurrent shock when compared to the null method (P < 0.05) and was not outperformed by other prediction models. Our final scoring rule provided relatively good accuracy (AUC, 0.73; sensitivity and specificity, 68%). Score points derived from the logistic prediction model revealed identical accuracy with AUCs at 0.73. Using a cutoff value greater than -154.5, our simple scoring rule showed a sensitivity of 68.3% and a specificity of 68.2%.
conclusionsOur simple clinical rule is not to replace clinical judgment, but to help clinicians predict recurrent shock during a patient's first dengue shock episode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.