Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24295401›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2014

Accurate label-free protein quantitation with high- and low-resolution mass spectrometers.

Jocelyn F Krey, Phillip A Wilmarth, Jung-Bum Shin, John Klimek, Nicholas E Sherman, Erin D Jeffery, Dongseok Choi, Larry L David, Peter G Barr-Gillespie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jocelyn F Krey *Oregon Hearing Research Center & Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Phillip A Wilmarth *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jung-Bum ShinOregon Hearing Research Center & Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
John KlimekProteomics Shared Resource, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Nicholas E ShermanW.M. Keck Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Lab, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Erin D JefferyW.M. Keck Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Lab, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Dongseok ChoiDepartment of Public Health & Preventative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Larry L DavidDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Peter G Barr-GillespieOregon Hearing Research Center & Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TED S ACOTT · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Hair-Bundle ProteinsR01DC002368 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Peter Gordon Barr-Gillespie · 1994 to 2026
$11.3M
PORTLAND AREA COMMUNICATION RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC005983 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARR-GILLESPIE, PETER GORDON · 2003 to 2017
$9.0M
Hair Bundle Structure and DynamicsR01DC011034 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARR-GILLESPIE, PETER GORDON · 2010 to 2024
$6.4M
PROTEIN CLEAVAGE SITES IN EXPERIMENTAL CATARACTOUS LENSR01EY007755 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID, LARRY L · 1995 to 2014
$3.6M
Global analysis of bundle protein transport in mouse vestibular hair cellsF32DC012455 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KREY, JOCELYN F · 2012 to 2013
$106k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007755NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC012455NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005983NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002368NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011034NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC011034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Label-free quantitation of proteins analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry uses either integrated peak intensity from the parent-ion mass analysis (MS1) or features from fragment-ion analysis (MS2), such as spectral counts or summed fragment-ion intensity. We directly compared MS1 and MS2 quantitation by analyzing human protein standards diluted into Escherichia coli extracts on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found that summed MS2 intensities were nearly as accurate as integrated MS1 intensities, and both outperformed MS2 spectral counting in accuracy and linearity. We compared these results to those obtained from two low-resolution ion-trap mass spectrometers; summed MS2 intensities from LTQ and LTQ Velos instruments were similar in accuracy to those from the Orbitrap. Data from all three instruments are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000602. Abundance measurements using MS1 or MS2 intensities had limitations, however. While measured protein concentration was on average well-correlated with the known concentration, there was considerable protein-to-protein variation. Moreover, not all human proteins diluted to a mole fraction of 10(-3) or lower were detected, with a strong falloff below 10(-4) mole fraction. These results show that MS1 and MS2 intensities are simple measures of protein abundance that are on average accurate but should be limited to quantitation of proteins of intermediate to higher fractional abundance.

Indexed as

HumansMass SpectrometryProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24295401
PMCPMC3946283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.