Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24295301›Full record

ArticleMethods in cell biology2013

Endomembrane and Golgi traffic in plant cells.

Giovanni Stefano, Anne Osterrieder, Chris Hawes, Federica Brandizzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giovanni StefanoDepartment of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA; Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Anne Osterrieder
Chris Hawes
Federica Brandizzi

Funding

Unfolded protein response in the model species Arabidopsis thalianaR01GM101038 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRANDIZZI, FEDERICA · 2012 to 2019
$2.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F008147/1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101038NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101038-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf epidermal cells make ideal specimens for the investigation of the plant secretory pathway in that it is relatively easy to tag with fluorescent proteins and visualize in vivo the various organelles of the pathway. A number of techniques can be employed to identify and study proteins within the endomembrane organelles and to study their dynamics and interactions. Here, we discuss the most commonly used approaches to express proteins within arabidopsis and tobacco leaves, the use of mutant screens to identify trafficking proteins, and the use of two in vivo techniques, Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and Förster resonance energy transfer, to study protein dynamics in plant cells.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsEndoplasmic ReticulumFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGolgi ApparatusGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntracellular MembranesMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceNicotianaPlant LeavesProtein TransportSecretory PathwayTransformation, GeneticArabidopsis ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsFluorescent proteinsFRET/FLIMGolgiLeavesMutant screeningPhotobleachingPlant secretory pathwayTransient expression

Identifiers

PMID24295301
PMCPMC10508055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.