Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24295136›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2013

Toward proof of concept of a one health approach to disease prediction and control.

Peter M Rabinowitz, Richard Kock, Malika Kachani, Rebekah Kunkel, Jason Thomas, Jeffrey Gilbert, Robert Wallace, Carina Blackmore, David Wong, William Karesh and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Longitudinal Study ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Prevalence of Lyme Disease and Relapsing FeverPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Peter M RabinowitzCurrent affiliation: University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Richard Kock
Malika Kachani
Rebekah Kunkel
Jason Thomas
Jeffrey Gilbert
Robert Wallace
Carina Blackmore
David Wong
William Karesh
Barbara Natterson
Raymond Dugas
Carol Rubin
Stone Mountain One Health Proof of Concept Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A One Health approach considers the role of changing environments with regard to infectious and chronic disease risks affecting humans and nonhuman animals. Recent disease emergence events have lent support to a One Health approach. In 2010, the Stone Mountain Working Group on One Health Proof of Concept assembled and evaluated the evidence regarding proof of concept of the One Health approach to disease prediction and control. Aspects examined included the feasibility of integrating human, animal, and environmental health and whether such integration could improve disease prediction and control efforts. They found evidence to support each of these concepts but also identified the need for greater incorporation of environmental and ecosystem factors into disease assessments and interventions. The findings of the Working Group argue for larger controlled studies to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the One Health approach.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlPublic Health SurveillanceAnimalsEnvironmental HealthHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePublic Healthanimal healthcomparative effectiveness researchenvironmental healthhuman healthinterprofessional relationsOne Healthproof of conceptpublic healthveterinary medicinezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID24295136
PMCPMC3840882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.