ArticleJournal of groups in addiction & recovery2013
Group Process in the single-gender Women's Recovery Group compared with mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling.
Article in Journal of groups in addiction & recovery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00230100 (Recovery Group for Women With Substance Use Disorders - Stage I), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Recovery Group for Women With Substance Use Disorders - Stage I
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Women's and men's experiences in group therapy for substance use disorders: A qualitative analysis.The American journal on addictions · 2022Trial
- Group therapy for women with substance use disorders: In-session affiliation predicts women's substance use treatment outcomes.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2018Trial
- Measuring affiliation in group therapy for substance use disorders in the Women's Recovery Group study: Does it matter whether the group is all-women or mixed-gender?The American journal on addictions · 2016Trial
- Group therapy for women with substance use disorders: results from the Women's Recovery Group Study.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2014Trial
- Moments of Change in Group Psychotherapy: Exploring Therapeutic Factors and Relational Processes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020Review
- Individual gender and group gender composition as predictors of differential benefit from mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders.Mindfulness · 2019Article
- Understanding the relapse process: exploring Iranian women's substance use experiences.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2019Article
- Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders.Clinical psychology review · 2018Review
- Group interventions.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Enhanced affiliation among members is thought to provide increased support for women in single-gender compared with mixed-gender group therapy for substance use disorders (SUDs) and to provide a potential mechanism of action for its efficacy. In a Stage I trial of single-gender versus mixed-gender group therapy for SUDs we examined affiliative statements made by members in two group treatments, single-gender Women's Recovery Group (WRG) and mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling (GDC). Twenty-eight WRG and 17 GDC group therapy tapes were coded and compared for five types of affiliative statements. Three types of affiliative statements (agreement, supportive, and completing a thought) were highly correlated and were more frequent in WRG than GDC (D=0.882, p=0.27). In GDC, women were more likely to provide an affiliative statement to a male group member than any other combination of directionality (p<0.01). Compared with mixed-gender, single-gender group therapy for SUDs may enhance support through greater frequency of affiliative statements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.