Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24294005›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2013

Features and outcomes of lupus nephritis in Morocco: analysis of 114 patients.

Intissar Haddiya, Hakim Hamzaoui, Nabil Tachfouti, Zitouna Al Hamany, Aicha Radoui, Najoua Zbiti, Yamama Amar, Hakima Rhou, Loubna Benamar, Naima Ouzeddoun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Intissar HaddiyaDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplantation, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Hakim Hamzaoui
Nabil Tachfouti
Zitouna Al Hamany
Aicha Radoui
Najoua Zbiti
Yamama Amar
Hakima Rhou
Loubna Benamar
Naima Ouzeddoun
Rabea Bayahia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is wide variation in clinical presentation and outcome of lupus nephritis (LN) among different ethnic groups. Few data for LN exist on North Africans, especially those from Morocco. The aim of our study was to review retrospectively the features and outcome of LN in Moroccan patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective study. A total of 114 patients with LN were included. All patients met American Rheumatism Association criteria. LN was classified according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification. We adopted previously defined outcome criteria for LN.

resultsThere were 101 females and 13 males, with a mean age of 29.9 years. At first presentation, we noted hypertension in 33%, hematuria in 76%, nephrotic syndrome in 53%, and renal failure in 60% of cases. Renal biopsy revealed predominant proliferative classes in more than 80% of patients. Patients received different regimens mainly based on intravenous cyclophosphamide. After a mean follow-up of 22 months, remission occurred in 45.5%, relapses in 82%, end-stage renal failure in 21%, and death in 16% of cases. Infection and neurological and cardiovascular diseases were the most frequent causes of death.

conclusionLN seems to be severe in our study, with a predominance of proliferative forms, severe renal manifestations, and poor renal and overall survival.

Indexed as

lupus nephritisnephritissystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID24294005
PMCPMC3839844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.