Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24293577›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rheumatology2014

Clinical features of patients with morphea and the pansclerotic subtype: a cross-sectional study from the morphea in adults and children cohort.

Andrew Kim, Nicholas Marinkovich, Rebecca Vasquez, Heidi T Jacobe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Localized scleroderma].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Morphea: The 2023 update.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Controversy around the morphea.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Scleroderma Mimickers.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew KimFrom the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Dermatology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Nicholas Marinkovich
Rebecca Vasquez
Heidi T Jacobe
University Dermatology · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

NORTH AND CENTRAL TEXAS CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024982 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2007 to 2011
$27.9M
UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
Assessment in Morphea for the Establishment of Non-Cutaneous Disease (AMEND)K23AR056303 · NIAMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JACOBE, HEIDI T · 2008 to 2012
$562k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024982NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024982NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR056303NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR056303-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePansclerotic morphea is a poorly described form of morphea with little information on prevalence, demographics, and clinical features. Classification criteria for this subtype varies and the distinction from other forms of morphea, such as extensive generalized morphea and pansclerotic morphea, is not always clear. The purpose of our study was to clarify classification criteria for pansclerotic morphea by identifying its prevalence in the morphea in adults and children (MAC) cohort and describing its demographic and clinical features as compared with generalized morphea.

methodsPatients who met predefined criteria for generalized and pansclerotic morphea were identified using a modified Laxer and Zulian classification system. Baseline demographic and clinical features of the patients were compiled and then analyzed for traits characteristic of pansclerotic morphea versus those of generalized morphea. One hundred and thirteen patients met the criteria for inclusion: pansclerotic (n = 13) and generalized morphea type (n = 100).

resultsPatients with pansclerotic morphea were more frequently male (46.2% vs 6%; p < 0.0001); had a shorter time to diagnosis (mean difference of 10.4 mos; 95% CI: 0.8-19.9 mos; p = 0.0332); higher rates of functional impairment (61.5% vs 16%; p = 0.0046); higher rates of deep involvement (61.5% vs 17%; p = 0.004); and higher average Rodnan Skin Score (mean difference of 10.8 points; 95% CI: 5-16.6; p = 0.0017), Localized Scleroderma Skin Damage Index (mean difference 28.3; 95% CI: 9-47.6; p = 0.009), and Physician Global Assessment of Disease Damage scores (mean difference 25.1; 95% CI: 0.3-50; p = 0.048).

conclusionOur results suggest demographic and clinical features are sufficient to define the pansclerotic subtype as they represent a distinct clinical phenotype with a more rapidly progressive and severe course commonly accompanied by disability. Presence of features of the pansclerotic phenotype should alert practitioners to the possibility of significant morbidity and the need for early aggressive treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesRegistriesScleroderma, LocalizedSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultLOCALIZED SCLERODERMAMORPHEAPANSCLEROTIC SCLEROSIS

Identifiers

PMID24293577
PMCPMC5607739
OpenAlexW2146622649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.