Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24293353›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis.

Anca Zalmanovici Trestioreanu, John Yaphe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Corticosteroids as standalone or add-on treatment for sore throat.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Corticosteroids for septic arthritis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Cyclamen europaeum extract for acute sinusitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Corticosteroids for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-term benefits of EPsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Choosing Wisely Canada rhinology recommendations.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Update on Intranasal Medications in Rhinosinusitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anca Zalmanovici TrestioreanuDepartment of Family Medicine, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinski Street, Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100.
John Yaphe
Clalit Health Services · ILUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute sinusitis is a common reason for primary care visits. It causes significant symptoms and often results in time off work and school.

objectivesWe examined whether intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are effective in relieving symptoms of acute sinusitis in adults and children. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL 2013, Issue 4, MEDLINE (January 1966 to May week 2, 2013), EMBASE (1990 to May 2013) and bibliographies of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing INCS treatment to placebo or no intervention in adults and children with acute sinusitis. Acute sinusitis was defined by clinical diagnosis and confirmed by radiological evidence or by nasal endoscopy. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with either resolution or improvement of symptoms. Secondary outcomes were any adverse events that required discontinuation of treatment, drop-outs before the end of the study, rates of relapse, complications and return to school or work. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed trial quality and resolved discrepancies by consensus. MAIN

resultsNo new trials were found for inclusion in this update. Four studies involving 1943 participants with acute sinusitis met our inclusion criteria. The trials were well-designed and double-blind and studied INCS versus placebo or no intervention for 15 or 21 days. The rates of loss to follow-up were 7%, 11%, 41% and 10%. When we combined the results from the three trials included in the meta-analysis, participants receiving INCS were more likely to experience resolution or improvement in symptoms than those receiving placebo (73% versus 66.4%; risk ratio (RR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.18). Higher doses of INCS had a stronger effect on improvement of symptoms or complete relief: for mometasone furoate 400 µg versus 200 µg (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18 versus RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.11). No significant adverse events were reported and there was no significant difference in the drop-out and recurrence rates for the two treatment groups and for groups receiving higher doses of INCS. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence is limited for acute sinusitis confirmed by radiology or nasal endoscopy but supports the use of INCS as a monotherapy or as an adjuvant therapy to antibiotics. Clinicians should weigh the modest but clinically important benefits against possible minor adverse events when prescribing therapy.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, IntranasalAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSinusitisAdrenal Cortex Hormones

Identifiers

PMID24293353
PMCPMC6698484
OpenAlexW1876092259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.