ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2014
Clinical evaluation of mtp40 polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of extra pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing a Conventional Multiplex PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Granulomatous Skin Infection Agents:Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Article
- Rapid and Visual Differentiation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- The Effects of Serum hs-CRP on the Incidence of Lung Cancer in Male Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Iranian journal of public health · 2019Article
- Performance of nested multiplex PCR assay targeting MTP40 and IS6110 gene sequences for the diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2017Article
- Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from non-tubercular mycobacteria by nested multiplex PCR targeting IS6110, MTP40 and 32kD alpha antigen encoding gene fragments.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patient samples is vital for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The emergence of M. tuberculosis strains with either no copies or only a single copy of IS6110 in Asian countries makes the standard PCR based diagnosis of M. tuberculosis using IS6110 not reliable. We studied the diagnostic efficacy of the in-house PCR amplification of the candidate gene mtp40 as an alternative to IS6110 element based diagnosis. Clinical samples included pulmonary and extra-pulmonary specimens from TB suspected patients residing in Puducherry, South India and were analyzed using in-house PCR procedures targeting IS6110 element and mtp40 genes. Out of 317 clinical specimens analyzed, 132 (41.6 %) and 114 (36 %) were found positive for mtp40 PCR and IS6110 PCR, respectively. However, 18 specimens that were found to negative for IS6110 PCR were found positive for mtp40 PCR, which was further confirmed by DNA sequencing method. PCR amplification of mtp40 gene for the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in clinical samples is fast, sensitive, and further identified clinical strains that lack IS6110 element in this region. It is clearly demonstrated that there is a significant difference between the two PCR procedures and the sensitivity and specificity levels of mtp40 PCR were found to be higher when compared with DNA sequencing method. Thus, mtp40 based PCR technique will be beneficial in diagnosis of TB where M. tuberculosis strains lack of IS6110 element is predominant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.