ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2014
Nitric oxide-eluting nanocomposite for cardiovascular implants.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nitric Oxide Releasing Nanomaterials for Cardiovascular Applications.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2024Review
- Vascular Nanomedicine: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges.Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis · 2020Review
- Novel Surfaces in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuits.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- A Material Conferring Hemocompatibility.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Accelerating in situ endothelialisation of cardiovascular bypass grafts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular implants must resist thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia, but they are prone to such patency limiting conditions during graft implantation and prior to endothelialisation. Nitric oxide (NO) released from the endothelium has a complex protective role in the cardiovascular system, and this study has addressed: (1) in situ NO release profiles from S-nitrosothiols ((S-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) and (S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO)) incorporated into polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanepoly(carbonate-urea)urethane (POSS-PCU) coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) in a physiological pulsatile flow, and (2) the determination of their interaction with endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), smooth muscle cells, platelets, whole blood kinetics. It was found that 1, 2, and 3 wt% SNAP/GSNO incorporated into POSS-PCU-CABG successfully eluted NO, but optimal elution was evident with 2 %-SNAP-POSS-PCU. NO release determined under static conditions using the Griess assay, and in situ measurements under pulsatile flow using amperometric probe was found to differ, thus confirming the significance of monitoring NO-elution under haemodynamic conditions. 2 %-SNAP-POSS-PCU demonstrated anti-thrombogenic kinetics through thromboelastography measurements, while metabolic activity using Alamar Blue™ assay and scanning electron microscopy demonstrated greater adhesion of EPCs and reduced adhesion of platelets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24293239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.