ReviewEndocrine pathology2014
Pathologic reporting of lymph node metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer: a call to action for the College of American Pathologists.
Review in Endocrine pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of the impact of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines in management of differentiated thyroid cancer patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- CD47 is associated with the up-regulation of the PD-1 oncogenic signaling pathway.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018Article
- Latero-cervical lymph node metastases (N1b) represent an additional risk factor for papillary thyroid cancer outcome.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2017Article
- Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2016Article
- A response to the "call to action" on pathologic reporting of lymph node metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer from the college of american pathologists.Endocrine pathology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymph nodes in differentiated thyroid cancer have many different histomorphologic features. The current AJCC staging system does not distinguish between different lymph node characteristics and is based entirely on the presence of metastatic disease to upstage pN0 to pN1. However, clinicians involved in the management of thyroid cancer recognize that there is a difference in the clinical significance of finding macroscopic versus microscopic nodes. There appears to be a difference in disease biology that allows lymph nodes to reach different sizes and to manifest disease extension outside the capsule, which has led clinicians, and even clinical practice guidelines, to stratify nodal metastases on the basis of these features. The inherent presumption is that all lymph node metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer do not have the same clinical significance with respect to the risk of recurrence and the risk of death. However, the College of American Pathology (CAP) has not mandated that pathologists include these findings as part of their standard reporting protocol in thyroid cancer. In order to arm clinicians with the tools to design clinical trials and to make important patient management decisions in the presence of lymph node metastases, it is imperative that the CAP adopt a strategy for more detailed reporting that is similar to the protocol currently utilized in breast cancer pathologic reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.