Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24292897›Full record

ArticleNeuromolecular medicine2014

Blockade of Nav1.8 currents in nociceptive trigeminal neurons contributes to anti-trigeminovascular nociceptive effect of amitriptyline.

Jingyao Liang, Xiaoyan Liu, Meiyan Pan, Wei Dai, Zhao Dong, Xiaolin Wang, Ruozhuo Liu, Jianquan Zheng, Shengyuan Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromolecular medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antidepressants inhibit NaNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Pain transduction: a pharmacologic perspective.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Update of chronic tension-type headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingyao LiangDepartment of Neurology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China, yingyao582@sina.com.
Xiaoyan Liu
Meiyan Pan
Wei Dai
Zhao Dong
Xiaolin Wang
Ruozhuo Liu
Jianquan Zheng
Shengyuan Yu
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNBeijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology · CNInstitute of Pharmacology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amitriptyline (AMI), a tricyclic antidepressant, has been widely used to prevent migraine attacks and alleviate other various chronic pain, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Accumulated evidence suggests that the efficacy of AMI is related to the blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of AMI on Na(v)1.8 currents in nociceptive trigeminal neurons and trigeminovascular nociception induced by electrical stimulation of the dura mater surrounding the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) in rats, as in the animal model of vascular headaches such as migraines. Using a whole-cell voltage recording technique, we showed that Na(v)1.8 currents were blocked by AMI in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 value of 6.82 μM in acute isolated trigeminal ganglion neurons of the rats. AMI caused a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage-dependent activation and steady-state inactivation and significantly blocked in a use-dependent manner and slowed the recovery from the inactivation of Na(v)1.8 currents. In addition, the systemic administration of AMI and A-803467 (a selective Na(v)1.8 channel blocker) potently alleviated the nociceptive behaviors (head flicks and grooming) induced by the electrical stimulation of the dura mater surrounding the SSS. Taken together, our data suggest that Na(v)1.8 currents in nociceptive trigeminal neurons are blocked by AMI through modulating the activation and inactivation kinetics, which may contribute to anti-nociceptive effect of AMI in animal models of migraines.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAmitriptylineAniline CompoundsAnimalsBlood VesselsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDura MaterElectric StimulationFuransIon Channel GatingMaleMigraine DisordersNAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNociceptionNociceptorsA 803467AmitriptylineAniline CompoundsFuransNAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelScn10a protein, ratSodiumSodium Channel BlockersTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID24292897
OpenAlexW2039485467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.