ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2014
Endovascular embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 1 and 2.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- N-butyl Cyanoacrylate Use in Various Neuroendovascular Diseases.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Review
- NBCA: Basic Knowledge.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Review
- Complications of Endovascular Treatments for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Nationwide Surveillance.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Observational
- Safety and Feasibility of Neuroendovascular Therapy for Elderly Patients: Analysis of Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 3.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Reprinted as
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study constitutes a part of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 1 and 2. Its purpose is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of endovascular embolization for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in Japan. Nine hundred and eighty-seven embolization procedures were registered with JR-NET 1 and 2 (424 procedures in 122 institutions with JRNET 1 and 563 procedures in 150 institutions with JRNET 2). In total, 790 patients (80.1%) had favourable clinical outcomes defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2 at 30 days after embolization. Complete AVM obliteration by embolization alone was achieved in 90 procedures (9.1%). The procedural morbidity and mortality rate was 2.5% and 0.3% per procedure, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression models, deep venous drainage and embolization of four or more feeding pedicles per session were significantly associated with any treatment-related complications (P = 0.02 and P = 0.003, respectively). About 6 cm or more in maximum nidus diameter had a negative correlation with complications (P = 0.003). Our study shows that embolization of cerebral AVMs was performed with a high degree of safety and a low rate of symptomatic complications in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24292606PMC4508693W2019898258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.