Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24292559›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2014

Integrated IMR for psychiatric and general medical illness for adults aged 50 or older with serious mental illness.

Stephen J Bartels, Sarah I Pratt, Kim T Mueser, John A Naslund, Rosemarie S Wolfe, Meghan Santos, Haiyi Xie, Erik G Riera

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02188732 (Self-Management Training and Automated Telehealth to Improve SMI Health Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02188732 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Self-Management Training and Automated Telehealth to Improve SMI Health Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2015 to 2021Enrolled301ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, DepressionArmsCBHH+AT, CBHH+SMT, CBHH
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Attitudes and Beliefs on Aging Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Serious Mental Illness.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen J Bartels
Sarah I Pratt
Kim T Mueser
John A Naslund
Rosemarie S Wolfe
Meghan Santos
Haiyi Xie
Erik G Riera
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · US

Funding

Integrated Illness Management and Recovery of SMIR34MH074786 · NIMH · NH STATE DEPT/HLTH STATISTICS/DATA MGMT · PI RIERA, ERIK G · 2005 to 2007
$530k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH074786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSelf-management is promoted as a strategy for improving outcomes for serious mental illness as well as for chronic general medical conditions. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of an eight-month program combining training in self-management for both psychiatric and general medical illness, including embedded nurse care management.

methodsParticipants were 71 middle-aged and older adults (mean age=60.3 ± 6.5) with serious mental illness and chronic general medical conditions who were randomly assigned to receive integrated Illness Management and Recovery (I-IMR) (N=36) or usual care (N=35). Feasibility was determined by attendance at I-IMR and nurse sessions. Effectiveness outcomes were measured two and six months after the intervention (ten- and 14-month follow-ups) and included self-management of psychiatric and general medical illness, participation in psychiatric and general medical encounters, and self-reported acute health care utilization.

resultsI-IMR participants attended 15.8 ± 9.5 I-IMR and 8.2 ± 5.9 nurse sessions, with 75% attending at least ten I-IMR and five nurse sessions. Compared with usual care, I-IMR was associated with greater improvements in participant and clinician ratings for psychiatric illness self-management, greater diabetes self-management, and an increased preference for detailed diagnosis and treatment information during primary care encounters. The proportion of I-IMR participants with at least one psychiatric or general medical hospitalization decreased significantly between baseline and ten- and 14-month follow-ups.

conclusionsI-IMR is a feasible intervention for this at-risk group and demonstrated potential effectiveness by improving self-management of psychiatric illness and diabetes and by reducing the proportion of participants requiring psychiatric or general medical hospitalizations.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleChronic DiseaseComorbidityDiabetes MellitusFeasibility StudiesHealth ServicesHospitalizationHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNew HampshirePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24292559
PMCPMC4994884
OpenAlexW2097526032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.