Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24292098›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014

Time since last vaccine dose in PCR-positive and PCR-negative children with suspected pertussis to monitor pertussis vaccine effectiveness.

M Riffelmann, J Mohr, W Hellenbrand, C H Wirsing von Koenig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M RiffelmannLabor:Medizin Krefeld Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum GmbH, Lutherplatz 40, 47805, Krefeld, Germany, marion.riffelmann@helios-kliniken.de.
J Mohr
W Hellenbrand
C H Wirsing von Koenig
Center for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology · DEHelios Klinikum Krefeld · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated whether the results of diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing combined with time since last vaccine dose could be used to monitor the effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccines. In 258 consecutive nasopharyngeal swabs from children and adolescents with typical pertussis symptoms, 80 were positive and 178 were negative in PCR for Bordetella pertussis DNA (IS 481). Time since last vaccine dose was available for 152 patients, of which 120 were fully immunised. Among the fully vaccinated patients, the median age of 41 PCR-positive patients was 8.4 years (range 0.9-12.3) and that of 79 PCR-negative cases was 3.3 years (range 0.4-14.1) (p < 0.01). The median time since last pertussis vaccine dose was 6.05 years [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.5-10.9] in PCR-positive cases and 2.22 years (95 % CI: 0.04-9.23) in PCR-negative cases (p < 0.001). The use of diagnostic PCR results from pertussis cases together with time since last vaccine dose permits estimates of the duration of protection after vaccination with acellular pertussis vaccines that are in keeping with more complex studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentBordetella pertussisChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePertussis VaccinePolymerase Chain ReactionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVaccines, AcellularWhooping CoughPertussis VaccineVaccines, Acellular

Identifiers

PMID24292098
OpenAlexW2145824739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.