Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24291614›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2014

Striatal dysfunction during reversal learning in unmedicated schizophrenia patients.

Florian Schlagenhauf, Quentin J M Huys, Lorenz Deserno, Michael A Rapp, Anne Beck, Hans-Joachim Heinze, Ray Dolan, Andreas Heinz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Ghrelin decreases sensitivity to negative feedback and increases prediction-error related caudate activity in humans, a randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  9. Activation of D1 receptors affects human reactivity and flexibility to valued cues.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The hippocampus as a generative model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Addressing Altered Anticipation as a Transdiagnostic Target Through Computational Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Florian SchlagenhaufDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: florian.schlagenhauf@charite.de.
Quentin J M HuysGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit and Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Department of Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lorenz DesernoDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael A RappDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Anne BeckDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Hans-Joachim HeinzeLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ray DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HeinzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeibniz Institute for Neurobiology · DEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 098362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjects with schizophrenia are impaired at reinforcement-driven reversal learning from as early as their first episode. The neurobiological basis of this deficit is unknown. We obtained behavioral and fMRI data in 24 unmedicated, primarily first episode, schizophrenia patients and 24 age-, IQ- and gender-matched healthy controls during a reversal learning task. We supplemented our fMRI analysis, focusing on learning from prediction errors, with detailed computational modeling to probe task solving strategy including an ability to deploy an internal goal directed model of the task. Patients displayed reduced functional activation in the ventral striatum (VS) elicited by prediction errors. However, modeling task performance revealed that a subgroup did not adjust their behavior according to an accurate internal model of the task structure, and these were also the more severely psychotic patients. In patients who could adapt their behavior, as well as in controls, task solving was best described by cognitive strategies according to a Hidden Markov Model. When we compared patients and controls who acted according to this strategy, patients still displayed a significant reduction in VS activation elicited by informative errors that precede salient changes of behavior (reversals). Thus, our study shows that VS dysfunction in schizophrenia patients during reward-related reversal learning remains a core deficit even when controlling for task solving strategies. This result highlights VS dysfunction is tightly linked to a reward-related reversal learning deficit in early, unmedicated schizophrenia patients.

Indexed as

RewardAdultBasal GangliaBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReversal LearningSchizophreniaYoung AdultComputational modelingImagingReversal learningRewardSchizophreniaVentral striatum

Identifiers

PMID24291614
PMCPMC3991847
OpenAlexW2162801180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.