Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24291072›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2014

Tracking progesterone receptor-mediated actions in breast cancer.

Todd P Knutson, Carol A Lange

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of PRMT1 and PRMT5 in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Todd P KnutsonDepartments of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation and Pharmacology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Carol A LangeDepartments of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation and Pharmacology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: lange047@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Role of Phospho-Progesterone Receptors (PR) in Hormone Refractory Breast CancerR01CA159712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LANGE, CAROL A · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
Progestin and growth factor cross-talk in breast cancerR01CA123763 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LANGE, CAROL A · 2006 to 2010
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA123763NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian steroid hormones contribute to breast cancer initiation and progression primarily through the actions of their nuclear transcription factors, the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptors (PRs). These receptors are important drivers of the luminal A and B subtypes of breast cancer, where estrogen-blocking drugs have been effective endocrine therapies for patients with these tumors. However, many patients do not respond, or become resistant to treatment. When endocrine therapies fail, the luminal subtypes of breast cancer are more difficult to treat because these subtypes are among the most heterogeneous in terms of mutation diversity and gene expression profiles. Recent evidence suggests that progestin and PR actions may be important drivers of luminal breast cancers. Clinical trial data has demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy with progestins drives invasive breast cancer and results in greater mortality. PR transcriptional activity is dependent upon cross-talk with growth factor signaling pathways that alter PR phosphorylation, acetylation, or SUMOylation as mechanisms for regulating PR target gene selection required for increased cell proliferation and survival. Site-specific PR phosphorylation is the primary driver of gene-selective PR transcriptional activity. However, PR phosphorylation and heightened transcriptional activity is coupled to rapid PR protein degradation; the range of active PR detected in tumors is likely to be dynamic. Thus, PR target gene signatures may provide a more accurate means of tracking PR's contribution to tumor progression rather than standard clinical protein-based (IHC) assays. Further development of antiprogestin therapies should be considered alongside antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFemaleHumansMammary Glands, HumanProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReceptors, ProgesteroneAntineoplastic AgentsEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsReceptors, ProgesteroneAntiprogestinsEstrogen receptor (ER)Gene expressionPhosphorylationProgesterone receptor (PR)SUMOylation

Identifiers

PMID24291072
PMCPMC3943696
OpenAlexW2027988818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.