ArticleDNA repair2014
Ribonucleotides as nucleotide excision repair substrates.
Article in DNA repair, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging roles of RNA:DNA hybrid regulation by mammalian ribonuclease H2 in replication stress and cancer.Journal of cell science · 2025Review
- Escherichia coli DNA replication: the old model organism still holds many surprises.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- AUF1 Recognizes 8-Oxo-Guanosine Embedded in DNA and Stimulates APE1 Endoribonuclease Activity.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2023Article
- Ribonucleotide Incorporation by Eukaryotic B-Family Replicases and Its Implications for Genome Stability.Annual review of biochemistry · 2022Review
- RNA: a double-edged sword in genome maintenance.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
- Molecular and physiological consequences of faulty eukaryotic ribonucleotide excision repair.The EMBO journal · 2020Review
- Processing of a single ribonucleotide embedded into DNA by human nucleotide excision repair and DNA polymerase η.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Current perspectives on mechanisms of ribonucleotide incorporation and processing in mammalian DNA.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2019Review
- Processing ribonucleotides incorporated during eukaryotic DNA replication.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2016Review
- Redundancy in ribonucleotide excision repair: Competition, compensation, and cooperation.DNA repair · 2015Review
- Ribonucleotides in bacterial DNA.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2015Review
- Investigation of bacterial nucleotide excision repair using single-molecule techniques.DNA repair · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The incorporation of ribonucleotides in DNA has attracted considerable notice in recent years, since the pool of ribonucleotides can exceed that of the deoxyribonucleotides by at least 10-20-fold, and single ribonucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases appears to be a common event. Moreover ribonucleotides are potentially mutagenic and lead to genome instability. As a consequence, errantly incorporated ribonucleotides are rapidly repaired in a process dependent upon RNase H enzymes. On the other hand, global genomic nucleotide excision repair (NER) in prokaryotes and eukaryotes removes damage caused by covalent modifications that typically distort and destabilize DNA through the production of lesions derived from bulky chemical carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites, or via crosslinking. However, a recent study challenges this lesion-recognition paradigm. The work of Vaisman et al. (2013) [34] reveals that even a single ribonucleotide embedded in a deoxyribonucleotide duplex is recognized by the bacterial NER machinery in vitro. In their report, the authors show that spontaneous mutagenesis promoted by a steric-gate pol V mutant increases in uvrA, uvrB, or uvrC strains lacking rnhB (encoding RNase HII) and to a greater extent in an NER-deficient strain lacking both RNase HI and RNase HII. Using purified UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins in in vitro assays they show that despite causing little distortion, a single ribonucleotide embedded in a DNA duplex is recognized and doubly-incised by the NER complex. We present the hypothesis to explain the recognition and/or verification of this small lesion, that the critical 2'-OH of the ribonucleotide - with its unique electrostatic and hydrogen bonding properties - may act as a signal through interactions with amino acid residues of the prokaryotic NER complex that are not possible with DNA. Such a mechanism might also be relevant if it were demonstrated that the eukaryotic NER machinery likewise incises an embedded ribonucleotide in DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.