ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2013
Validation of a novel protocol for calculating estimated energy requirements and average daily physical activity ratio for the US population: 2005-2006.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does dose matter in reducing gestational weight gain in exercise interventions? A systematic review of literature.Journal of science and medicine in sport · 2016Pooled it
- Daily metabolic expenditures: estimates from US, UK and polish time-use data.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Body size reference norms and subjective weight status: A gender and life course approach.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2018Article
- Cell-Specific "Competition for Calories" Drives Asymmetric Nutrient-Energy Partitioning, Obesity, and Metabolic Diseases in Human and Non-human Animals.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Occupational Physical Activity and Body Mass Index: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.PloS one · 2016Article
- The Inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES Dietary Data in Nutrition and Obesity Research and the Scientific Formulation of National Dietary Guidelines.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2015Review
- Cigarette smoking and interest in quitting among overweight and obese adults with serious mental illness enrolled in a fitness intervention.The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2015Article
- Opportunities for intervention strategies for weight management: global actions on fluid intake patterns.Obesity facts · 2015Review
- Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Objectively measured physical activity in Finnish employees: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2014Article
- Energy Flux and its Role in Obesity and Metabolic Disease.European endocrinology · 2014Review
- The independent association between diet quality and body composition.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Recent publications by ochsner authors: october 2013 - march 2014.Ochsner journal · 2014Article
- The Validity of US Nutritional Surveillance: USDA's Loss-Adjusted Food Availability Data Series 1971-2010.Current problems in cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo validate the PAR protocol, a novel method for calculating population-level estimated energy requirements (EERs) and average physical activity ratio (APAR), in a nationally representative sample of US adults.
methodsEstimates of EER and APAR values were calculated via a factorial equation from a nationally representative sample of 2597 adults aged 20 and 74 years (US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; data collected between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006). Validation of the PAR protocol-derived EER (EER(PAR)) values was performed via comparison with values from the Institute of Medicine EER equations (EER(IOM)).
resultsThe correlation between EER(PAR) and EER(IOM) was high (0.98; P<.001). The difference between EER(PAR) and EER(IOM) values ranged from 40 kcal/d (1.2% higher than EER(IOM)) in obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) men to 148 kcal/d (5.7% higher) in obese women. The 2005-2006 EERs for the US population were 2940 kcal/d for men and 2275 kcal/d for women and ranged from 3230 kcal/d in obese (BMI ≥30) men to 2026 kcal/d in normal weight (BMI <25) women. There were significant inverse relationships between APAR and both obesity and age. For men and women, the APAR values were 1.53 and 1.52, respectively. Obese men and women had lower APAR values than normal weight individuals (P¼.023 and P¼.015, respectively) [corrected], and younger individuals had higher APAR values than older individuals (P<.001).
conclusionThe PAR protocol is an accurate method for deriving nationally representative estimates of EER and APAR values. These descriptive data provide novel quantitative baseline values for future investigations into associations of physical activity and health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24290113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.