Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24289381›Full record

ReviewThe Review of scientific instruments2013

Invited review article: Methods for imaging weak-phase objects in electron microscopy.

Robert M Glaeser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Review of scientific instruments, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cryo-electron microscopy-based drug design.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CryomicroscopyFaraday discussions · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Conquer by cryo-EM without physically dividing.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert M GlaeserLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.

Funding

In-Focus Phase Contrast for Cryo-EMR01GM083039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI DOWNING, KENNETH H, GLAESER, ROBERT M · 2007 to 2014
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083039NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast has traditionally been produced in electron-microscopy of weak phase objects by simply defocusing the objective lens. There now is renewed interest, however, in using devices that apply a uniform quarter-wave phase shift to the scattered electrons relative to the unscattered beam, or that generate in-focus image contrast in some other way. Renewed activity in making an electron-optical equivalent of the familiar "phase-contrast" light microscope is based in part on the improved possibilities that are now available for device microfabrication. There is also a better understanding that it is important to take full advantage of contrast that can be had at low spatial frequency when imaging large, macromolecular objects. In addition, a number of conceptually new phase-plate designs have been proposed, thus increasing the number of options that are available for development. The advantages, disadvantages, and current status of each of these options is now compared and contrasted. Experimental results that are, indeed, superior to what can be accomplished with defocus-based phase contrast have been obtained recently with two different designs of phase-contrast aperture. Nevertheless, extensive work also has shown that fabrication of such devices is inconsistent, and that their working lifetime is short. The main limitation, in fact, appears to be electrostatic charging of any device that is placed into the electron diffraction pattern. The challenge in fabricating phase plates that are practical to use for routine work in electron microscopy thus may be more in the area of materials science than in the area of electron optics.

Indexed as

HolographyMicroscopy, ElectronStatic Electricity

Identifiers

PMID24289381
PMCPMC3855062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.