Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24289258›Full record

ReviewClinical physiology and functional imaging2014

Functional imaging in lung cancer.

S W Harders, S Balyasnikowa, B M Fischer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  6. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Chemotherapy Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S W HardersDeparment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
S Balyasnikowa
B M Fischer
Aarhus University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKRussian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer represents an increasingly frequent cancer diagnosis worldwide. An increasing awareness on smoking cessation as an important mean to reduce lung cancer incidence and mortality, an increasing number of therapy options and a steady focus on early diagnosis and adequate staging have resulted in a modestly improved survival. For early diagnosis and precise staging, imaging, especially positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT), plays an important role. Other functional imaging modalities such as dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) have demonstrated promising results within this field. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with a brief and balanced introduction to these three functional imaging modalities and their current or potential application in the care of patients with lung cancer.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansLung NeoplasmsMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPredictive Value of TestsTomography, X-Ray Computeddiagnosisdiffusion magnetic resonance imaging/methodslung neoplasms/diagnosisneoplasm stagingpositron emission tomography and computed tomography/methodstomography, x-ray computed/methods

Identifiers

PMID24289258
PMCPMC4413794
OpenAlexW2143591367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.