Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24289112›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2013

Detection of Brucella abortus DNA and RNA in different stages of development of the sucking louse Haematopinus tuberculatus.

Gianluca Neglia, Vincenzo Veneziano, Esterina De Carlo, Giorgio Galiero, Giorgia Borriello, Matteo Francillo, Giuseppe Campanile, Luigi Zicarelli, Laura Manna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A novelParasitology · 2025
    Article
  2. Detection ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Ecology ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gianluca NegliaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, Federico II University, V, Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy. neglia@unina.it.
Vincenzo Veneziano
Esterina De Carlo
Giorgio Galiero
Giorgia Borriello
Matteo Francillo
Giuseppe Campanile
Luigi Zicarelli
Laura Manna
University of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis is considered the world's most widespread zoonotic infection. It causes abortion and sterility in livestock leading to serious economic losses and has even more serious medical impact in humans, since it can be a trigger to more than 500,000 infections per year worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Haematopinus tuberculatus, a louse that can parasitize several ruminants, as a new host of brucellosis. Louse specimens were collected from seropositive and seronegative water buffaloes and divided in 3 developmental stages: adults, nymphs and nits. All samples were separately screened for Brucella spp. DNA and RNA detection by Real Time PCR. In particular, primers and probes potentially targeting the 16S rRNA and the Brucella Cell Surface 31 kDalton Protein (bcsp31) genes were used for Real Time PCR and buffalo β actin was used as a housekeeping gene to quantify host DNA in the sample. A known amount of B. abortus purified DNA was utilized for standard curve preparation and the target DNA amount was divided by the housekeeping gene amount to obtain a normalized target value. A further molecular characterization was performed for Brucella strain typing and genotyping by the Bruce-ladder, AMOS-PCR and MLVA assays. Data were statistically analysed by ANOVA.

resultsBrucella abortus DNA and RNA were detected in all developmental stages of the louse, suggesting the presence of viable bacteria. Data obtained by MLVA characterization support this finding, since the strains present in animals and the relative parasites were not always identical, suggesting bacterial replication. Furthermore, the detection of Brucella DNA and RNA in nits samples demonstrate, for the first time, a trans-ovarial transmission of the bacterium into the louse.

conclusionsThese findings identified H. tuberculatus as a new host of brucellosis. Further studies are needed to establish the role of this louse in the epidemiology of the disease, such as vector or reservoir.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnopluraBrucella abortusDNA, BacterialFemaleMaleNymphOvumReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialDNA, BacterialRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24289112
PMCPMC4220825
OpenAlexW1985574940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.