ArticleBMC neurology2013
Cognition is only minimally impaired in Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 (SCA14): a neuropsychological study of ten Norwegian subjects compared to intrafamilial controls and population norm.
Article in BMC neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cerebellum beyond motor control: cognitive dysfunction in spinocerebellar ataxias.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Novel mutation in exon11 ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of the Spectrum and Prevalence of Non-Motor Symptoms in Adults with Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022Review
- Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14: refining clinicogenetic diagnosis in a rare adult-onset disorder.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Article
- The "crab sign": an imaging feature of spinocerebellar ataxia type 48.Neuroradiology · 2020Observational
- Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Costa da Morte Ataxia (SCA36).Cerebellum (London, England) · 2020Article
- Resistance, vulnerability and resilience: A review of the cognitive cerebellum in aging and neurodegenerative diseases.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2020Review
- Comparison of cognitive profiles in spinocerebellar ataxia subtypes: a case series.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2019Article
- Genotype-phenotype correlations, dystonia and disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia type 14.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018Article
- Cerebellar neurochemical alterations in spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 appear to include glutathione deficiency.Journal of neurology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing awareness of the role of the cerebellum not only in motor, but also in cognitive and emotional functions. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 (SCA14) is an autosomal dominant hereditary ataxia characterized by a relatively pure cerebellar phenotype. Cognitive impairment has been reported in studies with phenotype descriptions of SCA14, but previous studies have been small without control groups, and no homogeneous and systematic test panel has been used. The objective of this study was to thoroughly characterize the neuropsychological profile in ten Norwegian SCA14 subjects compared to unaffected family members and population norm data.
methodsTen SCA14 subjects and ten intrafamilial unaffected age- and education-matched controls from two Norwegian families were included. The unaffected intrafamilial controls included six first degree relatives, two second degree relatives, and two spouses. General intellectual ability, memory, visuoperceptive skills, psychomotor speed, executive functions, depression and anxiety were examined using internationally standardized tests, with minimal need for manual response to avoid motor bias.
resultsNo significant cognitive deficit was found in SCA14 subjects compared to intrafamilial controls. Verbal IQ, verbal executive function and psychomotor speed tended to be reduced in affected subjects, but previously reported non-verbal executive dysfunction was not confirmed in this study.
conclusionOnly subtle cognitive impairment was found in SCA14 affected subjects. The current findings do not confirm earlier reports of cognitive dysfunction in SCA14, but does shows a mild impairment in specific verbal executive functions. Genotypic differences may partly account for this discrepancy, and further studies on larger materials are needed to verify the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.