Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24288658›Full record

ArticleISRN Pain2013

Double-blind acupuncture needle: a potential tool to investigate the nature of pain and pleasure.

Nobuari Takakura, Miho Takayama, Akiko Kawase, Ted J Kaptchuk, Hiroyoshi Yajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN Pain, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of sham acupuncture validation studies.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nobuari TakakuraDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2-9-1 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0063, Japan ; Second Department of Physiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan ; Japan School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Physiotherapy, Tokyo 150-0031, Japan.
Miho Takayama
Akiko Kawase
Ted J Kaptchuk
Hiroyoshi Yajima

Funding

Mentoring and Research in Placebo Studies, Asian Medicine, and CAMK24AT004095 · NCCIH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KAPTCHUK, TED · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT004095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost of our knowledge about similarities in the neural processing of painful and pleasant sensations in the brain derives from studying each phenomenon separately. Patients often feel pain induced by acupuncture, which is noxious stimulation having the symbolic message of the cure, as pleasant.

objectivesWe investigated whether the double-blind acupuncture needles are potential tool to investigate coinciding pain and pleasant events.

methodsParticipants were 109 healthy acupuncture students. An acupuncturist applied the double-blind placebo and the matching penetrating needle at bilateral forearm of each subject, one needle on each side of the arm. We asked the subjects to rate the pain associated with needle application and its unpleasantness or pleasantness on a visual analogue scale.

resultsOf 65 penetrating needle applications that elicited pain, 29 (45%) subjects did not describe the pain as being unpleasant, and interestingly, 18 (28%) subjects described the needle insertion as pleasant. There was no significant difference in reported pain intensity between penetrating needles elicited pain that elicited a pleasant sensation and those that elicited an unpleasant sensation (

conclusionsThe double-blind acupuncture needles can be a potential tool for investigating the concomitant hedonic (pleasure) experience of pain.

Indexed as

AcupunctureDouble-blindHedonicPainPleasureReward

Identifiers

PMID24288658
PMCPMC3839571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.