Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24288428›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2013

Rapid and inexpensive screening of genomic copy number variations using a novel quantitative fluorescent PCR method.

Martin Stofanko, Joan C Han, Sarah H Elsea, Heloísa B Pena, Higgor Gonçalves-Dornelas, Sérgio Danilo Junho Pena

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin StofankoGENE-Núcleo de Genética Médica, Avenida Afonso Pena 3111, 9th Floor, 30130-909 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Joan C Han
Sarah H Elsea
Heloísa B Pena
Higgor Gonçalves-Dornelas
Sérgio Danilo Junho Pena
Baylor College of Medicine · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Neuroendocrine Regulation of Metabolism and NeurocognitionZIAHD008898 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI HAN, JOAN C. · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008898PHS HHS ZIAHD008898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of human microdeletion and microduplication syndromes poses significant burden on public healthcare systems in developing countries. With genome-wide diagnostic assays frequently inaccessible, targeted low-cost PCR-based approaches are preferred. However, their reproducibility depends on equally efficient amplification using a number of target and control primers. To address this, the recently described technique called Microdeletion/Microduplication Quantitative Fluorescent PCR (MQF-PCR) was shown to reliably detect four human syndromes by quantifying DNA amplification in an internally controlled PCR reaction. Here, we confirm its utility in the detection of eight human microdeletion syndromes, including the more common WAGR, Smith-Magenis, and Potocki-Lupski syndromes with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. We present selection, design, and performance evaluation of detection primers using variety of approaches. We conclude that MQF-PCR is an easily adaptable method for detection of human pathological chromosomal aberrations.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsBase SequenceCase-Control StudiesChromosome AberrationsChromosome DisordersDNA PrimersFemaleGenetic TestingGenome, HumanHumansMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionROC CurveDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID24288428
PMCPMC3830787
OpenAlexW2155730549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.