Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24287543›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2013

Aptamer-based analysis: a promising alternative for food safety control.

Sonia Amaya-González, Noemí de-los-Santos-Alvarez, Arturo J Miranda-Ordieres, Maria Jesús Lobo-Castañón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. E2EDNA: Simulation Protocol for DNA Aptamers with Ligands.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An overview and future prospects on aptamers for food safety.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  13. Point-of-care detection ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. DNA Sequencing Sensors: An Overview.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia Amaya-GonzálezDepartamento de Química-Física y Analítica, Universidad de Oviedo, Julián Clavería, 8, Oviedo 33006, Spain. mjlc@uniovi.es.
Noemí de-los-Santos-Alvarez
Arturo J Miranda-Ordieres
Maria Jesús Lobo-Castañón

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring food safety is nowadays a top priority of authorities and professional players in the food supply chain. One of the key challenges to determine the safety of food and guarantee a high level of consumer protection is the availability of fast, sensitive and reliable analytical methods to identify specific hazards associated to food before they become a health problem. The limitations of existing methods have encouraged the development of new technologies, among them biosensors. Success in biosensor design depends largely on the development of novel receptors with enhanced affinity to the target, while being stable and economical. Aptamers fulfill these characteristics, and thus have surfaced as promising alternatives to natural receptors. This Review describes analytical strategies developed so far using aptamers for the control of pathogens, allergens, adulterants, toxins and other forbidden contaminants to ensure food safety. The main progresses to date are presented, highlighting potential prospects for the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosensing TechniquesFood ContaminationFood SafetyHumans

Identifiers

PMID24287543
PMCPMC3892839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.