Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24287332›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2013

Network analysis of GWAS data.

Mark D M Leiserson, Jonathan V Eldridge, Sohini Ramachandran, Benjamin J Raphael

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NetMix2: A Principled Network Propagation Algorithm for Identifying Altered Subnetworks.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NetMix: A Network-Structured Mixture Model for Reduced-Bias Estimation of Altered Subnetworks.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SNPeffect: identifying functional roles of SNPs using metabolic networks.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark D M LeisersonDepartment of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States; Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States.
Jonathan V Eldridge
Sohini Ramachandran
Benjamin J Raphael

Funding

Computational Approaches for Structural Variation Studies in GenomesR01HG005690 · NHGRI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAPHAEL, BENJAMIN · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005690NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identify genetic variants that distinguish a control population from a population with a specific trait. Two challenges in GWAS are: (1) identification of the causal variant within a longer haplotype that is associated with the trait; (2) identification of causal variants for polygenic traits that are caused by variants in multiple genes within a pathway. We review recent methods that use information in protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction networks to address these two challenges.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction Maps

Identifiers

PMID24287332
PMCPMC3867794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.