Hyperattenuated intracerebral lesions after mechanical recanalization in acute stroke: contrast and compare.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Why Does It Shine?-A Prognostic Analysis about Predisposing Factors for Blood-Brain Barrier Damage after Revascularisation of Cerebral Large-Vessel Occlusion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
   Article
2. A New Classification System for Postinterventional Cerebral Hyperdensity: The Influence on Hemorrhagic Transformation and Clinical Prognosis in Acute Stroke.Neural plasticity · 2021
   Article
3. Metallic Hyperdensity Sign on Noncontrast CT Immediately after Mechanical Thrombectomy Predicts Parenchymal Hemorrhage in Patients with Acute Large-Artery Occlusion.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Hyperattenuated intracerebral lesions after mechanical recanalization in acute stroke.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as