Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24287087›Full record

Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers in acute basilar artery occlusion.

M Möhlenbruch, S Stampfl, L Behrens, C Herweh, S Rohde, M Bendszus, C Hametner, S Nagel, P A Ringleb, M Pham

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in acute stroke caused by basilar artery steno-occlusive disease: The experience of a single stroke centre.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Postpartum Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Secondary to Vertebral Artery Dissection. Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M MöhlenbruchFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.) markus.moehlenbruch@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
S StampflFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.).
L BehrensFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.).
C HerwehFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.).
S RohdeFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.).
M BendszusFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.).
C HametnerFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.)Neurology (C.H., S.N., P.A.R.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
S NagelNeurology (C.H., S.N., P.A.R.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
P A RinglebNeurology (C.H., S.N., P.A.R.), University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
M PhamFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.M., S.S., L.B., C.H., S.R., M.B., M.P.).
Maine Farmland Trust · USHeidelberg University · DEMarks and Spencer (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBasilar artery occlusion remains one of the most devastating subtypes of ischemic stroke. The prognosis is poor if early recanalization is not achieved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of self-expanding retrievable stents in the endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-four patients with acute basilar artery occlusion were treated with Solitaire FR or Revive SE devices between December 2009 and May 2012. Additional treatment included intravenous and/or intra-arterial thrombolysis (21/24) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/permanent stent placement (7/24). Recanalization was assessed by means of the TICI score. Clinical outcome was determined at discharge (NIHSS), and at 3 months (mRS).

resultsMedian NIHSS score on admission was 24; median duration of symptoms was 254 minutes. Successful recanalization (TICI 2b +3) by thrombectomy only was achieved in 18 patients (75%). Intracranial stent deployment after thrombectomy caused by underlying atherosclerotic stenosis was performed in 7 patients. If these patients with intracranial stent placement are included, successful recanalization was achieved in 21 of 24 patients (87.5%). NIHSS improvement ≥10 points was reached in 54% of patients (n = 13/24). Mortality during the first 3 months was 29% (7/24). After 3 months, 8 patients (33%) had a favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2).

conclusionsIn our series, application of self-expanding retrievable stents in acute basilar artery occlusion resulted in a high recanalization rate without procedural complications and good clinical outcome in one-third of patients.

Indexed as

StentsAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral RevascularizationDevice RemovalEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMechanical ThrombolysisMiddle AgedRadiographyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24287087
PMCPMC7964527
OpenAlexW2169689352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.