Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24287030›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2014

Sweden SimSmoke: the effect of tobacco control policies on smoking and snus prevalence and attributable deaths.

Aimee M Near, Kenneth Blackman, Laura M Currie, David T Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. US Nicotine Vaping ProductInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015-2016.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aimee M Near1 Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenneth Blackman2 Econometrica, Incorporated, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Laura M Currie3 Division of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
David T Levy1 Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA dl777@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Control PoliciesU01CA152956 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, KONG, CHUNG YIN · 2010 to 2014
$7.4M
MODELING THE POLICY IMPACT OF CIGARETTE AND SMOKELESS USE ON US MORTALITYR01DA036497 · NIDA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, DAVID THEODORE · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
A Simulation of Tobacco Policy, Smoking and Lung CancerU01CA097450 · NCI · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI LEVY, DAVID THEODORE · 2002 to 2009
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097450NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152956NCI NIH HHS U01-CA97450-02NIDA NIH HHS R01DA036497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the effect of past tobacco control policies and projects the effect of future policies on smoking and snus use prevalence and associated premature mortality in Sweden.

methodsThe established SimSmoke model was adapted with population, smoking rates and tobacco control policy data from Sweden. SimSmoke evaluates the effect of taxes, smoke-free air, mass media, marketing bans, warning labels, cessation treatment and youth access policies on smoking and snus prevalence and the number of deaths attributable to smoking and snus use by gender from 2010 to 2040.

resultsSweden SimSmoke estimates that significant inroads to reducing smoking and snus prevalence and premature mortality can be achieved through tax increases, especially when combined with other policies. Smoking prevalence can be decreased by as much as 26% in the first few years, reaching a 37% reduction within 30 years. Without effective tobacco control policies, almost 54 500 lives will be lost in Sweden due to tobacco use by the year 2040.

conclusionBesides presenting the benefits of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy, the model identifies gaps in surveillance and evaluation that can help better focus tobacco control policy in Sweden.

Indexed as

Health PolicyModels, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSwedenTobacco, SmokelessYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24287030
PMCPMC4032481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.