Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24286919›Full record

ReviewTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2014

Regenerative medicine in Alzheimer's disease.

Kevin M Felsenstein, Kate M Candelario, Dennis A Steindler, David R Borchelt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nutrients · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Minimally Invasive and Regenerative Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Perspective: Neuroregenerative Nutrition.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. New approaches to treating Alzheimer's disease.Perspectives in medicinal chemistry · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin M FelsensteinDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Kate M CandelarioDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Dennis A SteindlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
David R BorcheltDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla; SantaFe HealthCare Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. Electronic address: drb1@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

STEM/PROGENITOR CELL PROTECTION FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASER01NS055165 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI STEINDLER, DENNIS A. · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS055165NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying novel, effective therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the major unmet medical needs for the coming decade. Because the current paradigm for developing and testing disease-modifying AD therapies is protracted and likely to be even longer, with the shift toward earlier intervention in preclinical AD, it is an open issue whether we can develop, test, and widely deploy a novel therapy in time to help the current at-risk generation if we continue to follow the standard paradigms of discovery and drug development. There is an imperative need to find safe and effective preventive measures that can be distributed rapidly to stem the coming wave of AD that will potentially engulf the next generation. We can define regenerative medicine broadly as approaches that use stem cell-based therapies or approaches that seek to modulate inherent neurogenesis. Neurogenesis, although most active during prenatal development, has been shown to continue in several small parts of the brain, including the hippocampus and the subventricular zone, suggesting its potential to reverse cognitive deficits. If AD pathology affects neurogenesis, then it follows that conditions that stimulate endogenous neurogenesis (eg, environmental stimuli, physical activity, trophic factors, cytokines, and drugs) may help to promote the regenerative and recovery process. Herein, we review the complex logistics of potentially implementing neurogenesis-based therapeutic strategies for the treatment of AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansNeurogenesisRegenerative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID24286919
PMCPMC3976713
OpenAlexW2046043184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.