Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24286369›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2013

Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

Suzanne A Eccles, Eric O Aboagye, Simak Ali, Annie S Anderson, Jo Armes, Fedor Berditchevski, Jeremy P Blaydes, Keith Brennan, Nicola J Brown, Helen E Bryant and 77 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 420 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

87 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne A Eccles
Eric O Aboagye
Simak Ali
Annie S Anderson
Jo Armes
Fedor Berditchevski
Jeremy P Blaydes
Keith Brennan
Nicola J Brown
Helen E Bryant
Nigel J Bundred
Joy M Burchell
Anna M Campbell
Jason S Carroll
Robert B Clarke
Charlotte E Coles
Gary J R Cook
Angela Cox
Nicola J Curtin
Lodewijk V Dekker
Isabel dos Santos Silva
Stephen W Duffy
Douglas F Easton
Diana M Eccles
Dylan R Edwards
Joanne Edwards
D Evans
Deborah F Fenlon
James M Flanagan
Claire Foster
William M Gallagher
Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Julia M W Gee
Andy J Gescher
Vicky Goh
Ashley M Groves
Amanda J Harvey
Michelle Harvie
Bryan T Hennessy
Stephen Hiscox
Ingunn Holen
Sacha J Howell
Anthony Howell
Gill Hubbard
Nick Hulbert-Williams
Myra S Hunter
Bharat Jasani
Louise J Jones
Timothy J Key
Cliona C Kirwan
Anthony Kong
Ian H Kunkler
Simon P Langdon
Martin O Leach
David J Mann
John F Marshall
Lesley Martin
Stewart G Martin
Jennifer E Macdougall
David W Miles
William R Miller
Joanna R Morris
Sue M Moss
Paul Mullan
Rachel Natrajan
James P B O'Connor
Rosemary O'Connor
Carlo Palmieri
Paul D P Pharoah
Emad A Rakha
Elizabeth Reed
Simon P Robinson
Erik Sahai
John M Saxton
Peter Schmid
Matthew J Smalley
Valerie Speirs
Robert Stein
John Stingl
Charles H Streuli
Andrew N J Tutt
Galina Velikova
Rosemary A Walker
Christine J Watson
Kaye J Williams
Leonie S Young
Alastair M Thompson
University of Manchester · GBKing's College London · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBCardiff University · GBImperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C508134/1Breast Cancer Now 2010NOVPR12Breast Cancer Now BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRECancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 10337Cancer Research UK 11022Cancer Research UK 11566Cancer Research UK 12011Cancer Research UK 15154Cancer Research UK 15602Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 16464Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/745Department of Health NIHR-CS-011-014Medical Research Council G0400170Medical Research Council MR/K011014/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer remains a significant scientific, clinical and societal challenge. This gap analysis has reviewed and critically assessed enduring issues and new challenges emerging from recent research, and proposes strategies for translating solutions into practice.

methodsMore than 100 internationally recognised specialist breast cancer scientists, clinicians and healthcare professionals collaborated to address nine thematic areas: genetics, epigenetics and epidemiology; molecular pathology and cell biology; hormonal influences and endocrine therapy; imaging, detection and screening; current/novel therapies and biomarkers; drug resistance; metastasis, angiogenesis, circulating tumour cells, cancer 'stem' cells; risk and prevention; living with and managing breast cancer and its treatment. The groups developed summary papers through an iterative process which, following further appraisal from experts and patients, were melded into this summary account.

resultsThe 10 major gaps identified were: (1) understanding the functions and contextual interactions of genetic and epigenetic changes in normal breast development and during malignant transformation; (2) how to implement sustainable lifestyle changes (diet, exercise and weight) and chemopreventive strategies; (3) the need for tailored screening approaches including clinically actionable tests; (4) enhancing knowledge of molecular drivers behind breast cancer subtypes, progression and metastasis; (5) understanding the molecular mechanisms of tumour heterogeneity, dormancy, de novo or acquired resistance and how to target key nodes in these dynamic processes; (6) developing validated markers for chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity; (7) understanding the optimal duration, sequencing and rational combinations of treatment for improved personalised therapy; (8) validating multimodality imaging biomarkers for minimally invasive diagnosis and monitoring of responses in primary and metastatic disease; (9) developing interventions and support to improve the survivorship experience; (10) a continuing need for clinical material for translational research derived from normal breast, blood, primary, relapsed, metastatic and drug-resistant cancers with expert bioinformatics support to maximise its utility. The proposed infrastructural enablers include enhanced resources to support clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo tumour models; improved access to appropriate, fully annotated clinical samples; extended biomarker discovery, validation and standardisation; and facilitated cross-discipline working.

conclusionsWith resources to conduct further high-quality targeted research focusing on the gaps identified, increased knowledge translating into improved clinical care should be achievable within five years.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsResearchTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID24286369
PMCPMC3907091
OpenAlexW2095783009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.