Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24286360›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2014

Melatonin for sedative withdrawal in older patients with primary insomnia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Ritva Lähteenmäki, Juha Puustinen, Tero Vahlberg, Alan Lyles, Pertti J Neuvonen, Markku Partinen, Ismo Räihä, Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Melatonin: A Review of the Evidence for Use in Hospital Settings.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ritva LähteenmäkiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Juha Puustinen
Tero Vahlberg
Alan Lyles
Pertti J Neuvonen
Markku Partinen
Ismo Räihä
Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä
University of Turku · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FISatakunta Central Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe compared the efficacy of melatonin and placebo as adjuvants in the withdrawal of patients from long term temazepam, zopiclone or zolpidem (here 'BZD') use.

methodsA double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted in a primary health care outpatient clinic. Ninety-two men or women (≥55 years) with primary insomnia and chronic BZD use received controlled release melatonin 2 mg (CRM) (n = 46) or placebo (n = 46) during the 1 month withdrawal from BZDs. Psychosocial support was provided. Follow-up continued for up to 6 months. Successful BZD withdrawal by the end of 1 month was confirmed by BZD plasma determinations, while reduction in BZD use and abstinence continuing for 6 months were noted.

resultsThere were two drop-outs on CRM and one on placebo. After a 1 month withdrawal, 31 participants (67%; 95% CI 54, 81) on CRM and 39 (85%; 74, 95) on placebo had withdrawn completely (intention-to-treat analysis between groups, P = 0.051; per protocol P = 0.043). Reduction in BZD use was similar or even more rare in the CRM than in the placebo group (P = 0.052 per protocol). After 6 months, 14 participants in the CRM group and 20 in the placebo group remained non-users of BZD (NS between groups). BZD doses were higher in the CRM than in the placebo group at the end of the 6 month follow-up (P = 0.025). Withdrawal symptoms did not differ between the groups.

conclusionsGradual dose reduction of BZDs combined with CRM or placebo, and psychosocial support produced high short term and moderate long term BZD abstinence. CRM showed no withdrawal benefit compared with placebo.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMelatoninMiddle AgedSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeHypnotics and SedativesMelatonincontrolled trialmelatonintemazepamwithdrawalzolpidemzopiclone

Identifiers

PMID24286360
PMCPMC4093923
OpenAlexW1486315929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.