ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2014
Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based study.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- In-hospital mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after implementation of national health insurance (NHI) in Indonesia.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Outpatient Healthcare of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Evidence from an Italian Real-World Investigation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was performed to assess the influence of sex on drug therapy and long-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of ACS patients who underwent PCI [women (n=8,884) and men (n=23,937)] between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, with at least a 1-year follow-up, based on the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Propensity score was used to identify a 1:1 matched cohort (n=17,768) for multivariable adjustment. The influence of sex on drug therapy and outcomes was examined by multivariate logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsFemale patients had an 18% and 12% lower likelihood of receiving aspirin (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)]=0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.77-0.88) and clopidogrel (OR(adj)=0.88, 95% CI=0.81-0.95), respectively, than male patients but had a 17% and 22% higher likelihood of receiving beta-blockers (OR(adj)=1.17, 95% CI=1.10-1.24) and statins (OR(adj)=1.22, 95% CI=1.14-1.29), respectively, than male patients in the matched cohort. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR(adj)) of rehospitalization for revascularization in women was 0.84 (95% CI=0.79-0.90) compared with men after at least a 1-year follow-up in the matched cohort.
conclusionsFemale patients with ACS who underwent PCI were less likely to receive aspirin and clopidogrel but were more likely to receive beta-blockers and statins than male patients. Male sex was associated with a higher risk of rehospitalization for revascularization than female sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.