Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24285902›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.

Kenneth I Vaden, Stefanie E Kuchinsky, Stephanie L Cute, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno, Mark A Eckert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Modular reconfiguration of an auditory control brain network supports adaptive listening behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The cingulate cortex facilitates auditory perception under challenging listening conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Brain Network Interconnectivity Dynamics Explain Metacognitive Differences in Listening Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth I VadenHearing Research Program, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425.
Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Stephanie L Cute
Jayne B Ahlstrom
Judy R Dubno
Mark A Eckert
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR14516NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC 00422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing speech in difficult listening conditions requires considerable focus of attention that is often demonstrated by elevated activity in putative attention systems, including the cingulo-opercular network. We tested the prediction that elevated cingulo-opercular activity provides word-recognition benefit on a subsequent trial. Eighteen healthy, normal-hearing adults (10 females; aged 20-38 years) performed word recognition (120 trials) in multi-talker babble at +3 and +10 dB signal-to-noise ratios during a sparse sampling functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast was elevated in the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and frontal operculum in response to poorer speech intelligibility and response errors. These brain regions exhibited significantly greater correlated activity during word recognition compared with rest, supporting the premise that word-recognition demands increased the coherence of cingulo-opercular network activity. Consistent with an adaptive control network explanation, general linear mixed model analyses demonstrated that increased magnitude and extent of cingulo-opercular network activity was significantly associated with correct word recognition on subsequent trials. These results indicate that elevated cingulo-opercular network activity is not simply a reflection of poor performance or error but also supports word recognition in difficult listening conditions.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleFrontal LobeGyrus CinguliHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysOxygenPsychomotor PerformanceRecognition, PsychologySignal-To-Noise RatioSpeech PerceptionOxygen

Identifiers

PMID24285902
PMCPMC3841458
OpenAlexW2063324032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.