Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24285901›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Processing of hedonic and chemosensory features of taste in medial prefrontal and insular networks.

Ahmad Jezzini, Luca Mazzucato, Giancarlo La Camera, Alfredo Fontanini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. In praise of the hyperbola.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Survey of temporal coding of sensory information.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Neuronal Activity in the Gustatory Cortex during Economic Choice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multisensory Integration Underlies the Distinct Representation of Odor-Taste Mixtures in the Gustatory Cortex of Behaving Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Neuronal Ensembles in the Infralimbic Cortex Dynamically Process Distinct Aspects of Hedonic Value.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad JezziniDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Graduate Program in Neuroscience, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Luca Mazzucato
Giancarlo La Camera
Alfredo Fontanini

Funding

Effects of expectation on gustatory cortical activityR01DC010389 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO · 2009 to 2014
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010389NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC010389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the research on cortical processing of taste has focused on either the primary gustatory cortex (GC) or the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). However, these are not the only areas involved in taste processing. Gustatory information can also reach another frontal region, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), via direct projections from GC. mPFC has been studied extensively in relation to its role in controlling goal-directed action and reward-guided behaviors, yet very little is known about its involvement in taste coding. The experiments presented here address this important point and test whether neurons in mPFC can significantly process the physiochemical and hedonic dimensions of taste. Spiking responses to intraorally delivered tastants were recorded from rats implanted with bundles of electrodes in mPFC and GC. Analysis of single-neuron and ensemble activity revealed similarities and differences between the two areas. Neurons in mPFC can encode the chemosensory identity of gustatory stimuli. However, responses in mPFC are sparser, more narrowly tuned, and have a later onset than in GC. Although taste quality is more robustly represented in GC, taste palatability is coded equally well in the two areas. Additional analysis of responses in neurons processing the hedonic value of taste revealed differences between the two areas in temporal dynamics and sensitivities to palatability. These results add mPFC to the network of areas involved in processing gustatory stimuli and demonstrate significant differences in taste-coding between GC and mPFC.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCerebral CortexData Interpretation, StatisticalDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleFood PreferencesNerve NetNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansRewardSomatosensory CortexStimulation, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID24285901
PMCPMC3841457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.