Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24285712›Full record

ArticleBiology open2013

Late-replicating CNVs as a source of new genes.

David Juan, Daniel Rico, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Oscar Fernández-Capetillo, Alfonso Valencia

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi-Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Annual meeting of the EpiGeneSys Network of Excellence--Advancing epigenetics towards systems biology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David JuanStructural Biology and BioComputing Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Rico
Tomas Marques-Bonet
Oscar Fernández-Capetillo
Alfonso Valencia
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

European Research Council 210520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asynchronous replication of the genome has been associated with different rates of point mutation and copy number variation (CNV) in human populations. Here, our aim was to investigate whether the bias in the generation of CNV that is associated with DNA replication timing might have conditioned the birth of new protein-coding genes during evolution. We show that genes that were duplicated during primate evolution are more commonly found among the human genes located in late-replicating CNV regions. We traced the relationship between replication timing and the evolutionary age of duplicated genes. Strikingly, we found that there is a significant enrichment of evolutionary younger duplicates in late-replicating regions of the human and mouse genome. Indeed, the presence of duplicates in late-replicating regions gradually decreases as the evolutionary time since duplication extends. Our results suggest that the accumulation of recent duplications in late-replicating CNV regions is an active process influencing genome evolution.

Indexed as

CNVDNA replication timingDuplicated genesEvolution

Identifiers

PMID24285712
PMCPMC3863426
OpenAlexW2950288401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.