ArticleScientific reports2013
The influence of the wind in the Schmallenberg virus outbreak in Europe.
Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogens spread by high-flying wind-borne mosquitoes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Viral Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for One Health Discovery and Surveillance of (Re)Emerging Viruses: A Deep Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Investigating serological evidence of Schmallenberg virus in cattle in eastern Algeria.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025Article
- Assessing the Risk of Windborne Dispersal ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Occurrence and surveillance of Taiwanese bovine arboviruses using hematophagous insects in dairy farms during 2012-2019.Journal of medical entomology · 2023Article
- Hotspots and super-spreaders: Modelling fine-scale malaria parasite transmission using mosquito flight behaviour.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- Coronaviruses in cattle.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Review
- Emerging orthobunyaviruses associated with CNS disease.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Review
- Review
- Laboratory evaluation of stable isotope labeling of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) for adult dispersal studies.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Schmallenberg virus: a systematic international literature review (2011-2019) from an Irish perspective.Irish veterinary journal · 2019Review
- Culicoides species composition and abundance on Irish cattle farms: implications for arboviral disease transmission.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Hypothetical route of the introduction of Schmallenberg virus into Ireland using two complementary analyses.The Veterinary record · 2018Article
- Quantification of within- and between-farm dispersal ofThe Journal of applied ecology · 2017Article
- Quantifying the roles of host movement and vector dispersal in the transmission of vector-borne diseases of livestock.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- A freedom from disease study: Schmallenberg virus in the south of England in 2015.The Veterinary record · 2016Article
- Post-epidemic Schmallenberg virus circulation: parallel bovine serological and Culicoides virological surveillance studies in Ireland.BMC veterinary research · 2016Article
- Monitoring for bovine arboviruses in the most southwestern islands in Japan between 1994 and 2014.BMC veterinary research · 2016Article
- Epidemiological analysis of bovine ephemeral fever in 2012-2013 in the subtropical islands of Japan.BMC veterinary research · 2016Article
- Characteristics of Wind-Infective Farms of the 2006 Bluetongue Serotype 8 Epidemic in Northern Europe.EcoHealth · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A model previously developed for the wind-borne spread by midges of bluetongue virus in NW Europe in 2006 is here modified and applied to the spread of Schmallenberg virus in 2011. The model estimates that pregnant animals were infected 113 days before producing malformed young, the commonest symptom of reported infection, and explains the spatial and temporal pattern of infection in 70% of the 3,487 affected farms, most of which were infected by midges arriving through downwind movement (62% of explained infections), or a mixture of downwind and random movements (38% of explained infections), during the period of day (1600-2100 h, i.e. dusk) when these insects are known to be most active. The main difference with Bluetongue is the higher rate of spread of SBV, which has important implications for disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.