Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24285217›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2014

In the rat liver, Adenoviral gene transfer efficiency is comparable to AAV.

P S Montenegro-Miranda, V Pichard, D Aubert, L Ten Bloemendaal, S Duijst, D R de Waart, N Ferry, P J Bosma

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of AAV8-hMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A QuantitativeMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Article
  6. High-Capacity Adenoviral Vectors: Expanding the Scope of Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Gene replacement therapy for genetic hepatocellular jaundice.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015
    Review
  9. Liver-targeted gene therapy: Approaches and challenges.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P S Montenegro-MirandaTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V PichardINSERM UMR 948 Biothezrapies Hepatiques, Nantes, France.
D AubertINSERM UMR 948 Biothezrapies Hepatiques, Nantes, France.
L Ten BloemendaalTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S DuijstTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D R de WaartTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N FerryINSERM UMR 948 Biothezrapies Hepatiques, Nantes, France.
P J BosmaTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLInserm · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoviral (AdV) and Adenovirus-associated viral (AAV) vectors both are used for in vivo gene therapy of inherited liver disorders, such as Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1. In a relevant animal model, the Gunn rat, both vectors efficiently correct the severe hyperbilirubinemia characteristic of this liver disorder. Although the clinical use of AAV is more advanced, as demonstrated by the successful phase 1 trial in hemophilia B patients, because of its large cloning capacity AdV remains an attractive option. A direct comparison of the efficacy of these two vectors in the liver in a relevant disease model has not been reported. Aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of clinically applicable doses of both vectors in the Gunn rat. AdV or scAAV (self-complimentary AAV) ferrying identical liver-specific expression cassettes of the therapeutic gene, UGT1A1, were injected into the tail vein. As the titration methods of these two vectors are very different, a comparison based on vector titers is not valid. Therefore, their efficacy was compared by determining the amount of vector genomes delivered to the liver required for therapeutic correction of serum bilirubin. Like AAV, the liver-specific first-generation AdV also provided sustained correction in this relevant disease model. UGT1A1 mRNA expression provided per genome was comparable for both vectors. Flanking the expression cassette in AdV with AAV-ITRs (inverted terminal repeats), increased UGT1A1 mRNA expression eightfold which resulted in a significant improvement of efficacy. Compared with AAV, less AdV genomes were needed for complete correction of hyperbilirubinemia.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsBilirubinCrigler-Najjar SyndromeDependovirusDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesGlucuronosyltransferaseHEK293 CellsHumansLiverMaleRatsRats, GunnBilirubinGlucuronosyltransferaseRNA, MessengerUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID24285217
OpenAlexW1978185551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.