Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24285196›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

A parent-of-origin effect on honeybee worker ovary size.

Benjamin P Oldroyd, Michael H Allsopp, Katherine M Roth, Emily J Remnant, Robert A Drewell, Madeleine Beekman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Parent-of-origin effects, allele-specific expression, genomic imprinting and paternal manipulation in social insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic Molecular Mechanisms in Insects.Neotropical entomology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Testing the kinship theory of intragenomic conflict in honey bees (Apis mellifera).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin P OldroydBehaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, , Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia, Honey Bee Research Section, ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute, , Private Bag X5017, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa, Department of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, , 301 Platt Boulevard, Claremont, CA 91001, USA.
Michael H Allsopp
Katherine M Roth
Emily J Remnant
Robert A Drewell
Madeleine Beekman
University of Sydney · AUAgricultural Research Council of South Africa · ZAHarvey Mudd College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apis mellifera capensis is unique among honeybees in that unmated workers can produce pseudo-clonal female offspring via thelytokous parthenogenesis. Workers use this ability to compete among themselves and with their queen to be the mother of new queens. Males could therefore enhance their reproductive success by imprinting genes that enhance fertility in their daughter workers. This possibility sets the scene for intragenomic conflict between queens and drones over worker reproductive traits. Here, we show a strong parent-of-origin effect for ovary size (number of ovarioles) in reciprocal crosses between two honeybee subspecies, A. m. capensis and Apis mellifera scutellata. In this cross, workers with an A. m. capensis father had 30% more ovarioles than genotypically matched workers with an A. m. scutellata father. Other traits we measured (worker weight at emergence and the presence/absence of a spermatheca) are influenced more by rearing conditions than by parent-of-origin effects. Our study is the first to show a strong epigenetic (or, less likely, cytoplasmic maternal) effect for a reproductive trait in the honeybee and suggests that a search for parent-of-origin effects in other social insects may be fruitful.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesCrosses, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleMaleOrgan SizeOvaryParthenogenesisReproductionApis mellifera capensisimprintinginterspecific crossesintragenomic conflictparent-of-origin effectsreciprocal effects

Identifiers

PMID24285196
PMCPMC3866398
OpenAlexW2109801638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.