Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24284874›Full record

ReviewViruses2013

Newer gene editing technologies toward HIV gene therapy.

N Manjunath, Guohua Yi, Ying Dang, Premlata Shankar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR/Cas9: a tool to eradicate HIV-1.AIDS research and therapy · 2022
    Review
  5. Cure and Long-Term Remission Strategies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Use of CRISPR/Cas9 as a Tool to Study Human Infectious Viruses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Elimination of infectious HIV DNA by CRISPR-Cas9.Current opinion in virology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. In Vivo Excision of HIV-1 Provirus by saCas9 and Multiplex Single-Guide RNAs in Animal Models.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N ManjunathCenter of Excellence in Infectious Disease, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX 79905, USA. Manjunath.swamy@ttuhsc.edu.
Guohua Yi
Ying Dang
Premlata Shankar
Texas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

RNAi manipulations of DC to enhance HIV immunogenicityR01AI084795 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI SHANKAR, PREMLATA · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
HIV protection by ZFN-based disruption of CCR5 gene in Hematopoietic stem cellsR21HL116268 · NHLBI · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI SHANKAR, PREMLATA, WU, HAOQUAN · 2012 to 2013
$404k
HIV-Induced Immune Activation in Humanized MIceR21AI108259 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI SWAMY, MANJUNATH NARASIMHA · 2013 to 2014
$404k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL116268NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL116268NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI084795NIAID NIH HHS R01AI084795NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI108259NIAID NIH HHS R21AI108259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the great success of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in ameliorating the course of HIV infection, alternative therapeutic approaches are being pursued because of practical problems associated with life-long therapy. The eradication of HIV in the so-called "Berlin patient" who received a bone marrow transplant from a CCR5-negative donor has rekindled interest in genome engineering strategies to achieve the same effect. Precise gene editing within the cells is now a realistic possibility with recent advances in understanding the DNA repair mechanisms, DNA interaction with transcription factors and bacterial defense mechanisms. Within the past few years, four novel technologies have emerged that can be engineered for recognition of specific DNA target sequences to enable site-specific gene editing: Homing Endonuclease, ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas9 system. The most recent CRISPR/Cas9 system uses a short stretch of complementary RNA bound to Cas9 nuclease to recognize and cleave target DNA, as opposed to the previous technologies that use DNA binding motifs of either zinc finger proteins or transcription activator-like effector molecules fused to an endonuclease to mediate sequence-specific DNA cleavage. Unlike RNA interference, which requires the continued presence of effector moieties to maintain gene silencing, the newer technologies allow permanent disruption of the targeted gene after a single treatment. Here, we review the applications, limitations and future prospects of novel gene-editing strategies for use as HIV therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDNA RepairGenetic TherapyHIV InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID24284874
PMCPMC3856413
OpenAlexW1989141229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.