Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24284619›Full record

ReviewNutrients2013

Bone mass and mineral metabolism alterations in adult celiac disease: pathophysiology and clinical approach.

Michele Di Stefano, Caterina Mengoli, Manuela Bergonzi, Gino Roberto Corazza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical characteristics of pregnancy and lactation associated osteoporosis: An online survey study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Celiac disease and bone.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors influencing peak bone mass gain.Frontiers of medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele Di StefanoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, IRCCS "S.Matteo" Hospital Foundation, Pavia 27100, Italy. gr.corazza@smatteo.pv.it.
Caterina Mengoli
Manuela Bergonzi
Gino Roberto Corazza
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis affects many patients with celiac disease (CD), representing the consequence of calcium malabsorption and persistent activation of mucosal inflammation. A slight increase of fracture risk is evident in this condition, particularly in those with overt malabsorption and in postmenopausal state. The adoption of a correct gluten-free diet (GFD) improves bone derangement, but is not able to normalize bone mass in all the patients. Biomarkers effective in the prediction of bone response to gluten-free diet are not yet available and the indications of guidelines are still imperfect and debated. In this review, the pathophysiology of bone loss is correlated to clinical aspects, defining an alternative proposal of management for this condition.

Indexed as

Bone DensityDiet, Gluten-FreeAdultBone and BonesCalcium, DietaryCeliac DiseaseFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalCalcium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID24284619
PMCPMC3847761
OpenAlexW2022638195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.