Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24284319›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

In vivo electroporation of minicircle DNA as a novel method of vaccine delivery to enhance HIV-1-specific immune responses.

Qingtao Wang, Wei Jiang, Yuhai Chen, Pengyu Liu, Chunjie Sheng, Shuai Chen, Hui Zhang, Changchuan Pan, Shijuan Gao, Wenlin Huang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A comprehensive comparison of DNA and RNA vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Live attenuated-nonpathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Novel Cre Recombinase-MediatedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. COL7A1 Editing via CRISPR/Cas9 in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. DNA vaccines for prostate cancer.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qingtao WangCAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wei Jiang
Yuhai Chen
Pengyu Liu
Chunjie Sheng
Shuai Chen
Hui Zhang
Changchuan Pan
Shijuan Gao
Wenlin Huang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccines offer advantage over conventional vaccines, as they are safer to use, easier to produce, and able to induce humoral as well cellular immune responses. Unfortunately, no DNA vaccines have been licensed for human use for the difficulties in developing an efficient and safe in vivo gene delivery system. In vivo electroporation (EP)-based DNA delivery has attracted great attention for its potency to enhance cellular uptake of DNA vaccines and function as an adjuvant. Minicircle DNA (a new form of DNA containing only a gene expression cassette and lacking a backbone of bacterial plasmid DNA) is a powerful candidate of gene delivery in terms of improving the levels and the duration of transgene expression in vivo. In this study, as a novel vaccine delivery system, we combined in vivo EP and the minicircle DNA carrying a codon-optimized HIV-1 gag gene (minicircle-gag) to evaluate the immunogenicity of this system. We found that minicircle-gag conferred persistent and high levels of gag expression in vitro and in vivo. The use of EP delivery further increased minicircle-based gene expression. Moreover, when delivered by EP, minicircle-gag vaccination elicited a 2- to 3-fold increase in cellular immune response and a 1.5- to 3-fold augmentation of humoral immune responses compared with those elicited by a pVAX1-gag positive control. Increased immunogenicity of EP-assisted minicircle-gag may benefit from increasing local antigen expression, upregulating inflammatory genes, and recruiting immune cells. Collectively, in vivo EP of minicircle DNA functions as a novel vaccine platform that can enhance efficacy and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBlotting, WesternDNA, KinetoplastDrug Delivery SystemsElectroporationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEnzyme-Linked Immunospot Assaygag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV-1Immunity, HumoralImmunohistochemistryLuciferasesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, Kinetoplastgag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusLuciferasesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID24284319
PMCPMC3911567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.