Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24283202›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hematology & oncology2013

Interim analysis of safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis and low platelet counts.

Moshe Talpaz, Ronald Paquette, Lawrence Afrin, Solomon I Hamburg, Josef T Prchal, Katarzyna Jamieson, Howard R Terebelo, Gregory L Ortega, Roger M Lyons, Ramon V Tiu and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Janus kinase-1 and Janus kinase-2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Moshe TalpazUniversity of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor MI 48109, USA. mtalpaz@med.umich.edu.
Ronald Paquette
Lawrence Afrin
Solomon I Hamburg
Josef T Prchal
Katarzyna Jamieson
Howard R Terebelo
Gregory L Ortega
Roger M Lyons
Ramon V Tiu
Elliott F Winton
Kavita Natrajan
Olatoyosi Odenike
David Claxton
Wei Peng
Peter O'Neill
Susan Erickson-Viitanen
Lance Leopold
Victor Sandor
Richard S Levy
Hagop M Kantarjian
Srdan Verstovsek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRuxolitinib, a Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor, demonstrated improvements in spleen volume, symptoms, and survival over placebo and best available therapy in intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis patients with baseline platelet counts ≥100 × 109/L in phase III studies. The most common adverse events were dose-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, which were anticipated because thrombopoietin and erythropoietin signal through JAK2. These events were manageable, rarely leading to treatment discontinuation. Because approximately one-quarter of MF patients have platelet counts <100 × 109/L consequent to their disease, ruxolitinib was evaluated in this subset of patients using lower initial doses. Interim results of a phase II study of ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patients with baseline platelet counts of 50-100 × 109/L are reported.

methodsRuxolitinib was initiated at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (BID), and doses could be increased by 5 mg once daily every 4 weeks to 10 mg BID if platelet counts remained adequate. Additional dosage increases required evidence of suboptimal efficacy. Assessments included measurement of spleen volume by MRI, MF symptoms by MF Symptom Assessment Form v2.0 Total Symptom Score [TSS]), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC); EORTC QLQ-C30, and safety/tolerability.

resultsBy week 24, 62% of patients achieved stable doses ≥10 mg BID. Median reductions in spleen volume and TSS were 24.2% and 43.8%, respectively. Thrombocytopenia necessitating dose reductions and dose interruptions occurred in 12 and 8 patients, respectively, and occurred mainly in patients with baseline platelet counts ≤75 × 109/L. Seven patients experienced platelet count increases ≥15 × 109/L. Mean hemoglobin levels remained stable over the treatment period. Two patients discontinued for adverse events: 1 for grade 4 retroperitoneal hemorrhage secondary to multiple and suspected pre-existing renal artery aneurysms and 1 for grade 4 thrombocytopenia.

conclusionsResults suggest that a low starting dose of ruxolitinib with escalation to 10 mg BID may be appropriate in myelofibrosis patients with low platelet counts.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PlateletsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansJanus KinasesMaleNitrilesPlatelet CountPrimary MyelofibrosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeJanus KinasesNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID24283202
PMCPMC4176265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.