Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24282708›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2012

Cardiac biomarkers: new tools for heart failure management.

Navaid Iqbal, Bailey Wentworth, Rajiv Choudhary, Alejandro De La Parra Landa, Benjamin Kipper, Arrash Fard, Alan S Maisel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [A review on the clinical application of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in neonatal diseases].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Understanding cardiac extracellular matrix remodeling to develop biomarkers of myocardial infarction outcomes.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Navaid IqbalVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA;
Bailey Wentworth
Rajiv Choudhary
Alejandro De La Parra Landa
Benjamin Kipper
Arrash Fard
Alan S Maisel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has seen exciting advances in the field of biomarkers used in managing patients with heart failure (HF). Biomarker research has broadened our knowledge base, shedding more light on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms occurring in patients with both acute and chronic HF. The criterion required by an ideal cardiovascular biomarker has been progressively changing to an era of sensitive assays that can be used to guide treatment. Recent technological advances have made it possible to rapidly measure even minute amounts of these proteins by means of higher sensitivity assays. With a high prevalence of comorbidities associated with HF, an integrated approach utilizing multiple biomarkers have shown promise in predicting mortality, better risk stratification and reducing re-hospitalizations, thus lowering health-care costs. This review provides a brief insight into recent advances in the field of biomarkers currently used in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute and chronic HF.

Indexed as

cardiac myocyteDecompensated heart failureglomerular filtration ratenatriuretic peptides

Identifiers

PMID24282708
PMCPMC3839143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.