ArticlePloS one2013
Cervicothoracic multisegmental transpinal evoked potentials in humans.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03669302 (Activity-Dependent Transspinal Stimulation for Recovery of Walking Ability After Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Activity-Dependent Transspinal Stimulation for Recovery of Walking Ability After Spinal Cord Injury
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and motor responses in individuals with spinal cord injury: A methodological review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Interactions between arm and leg neuronal circuits following paired cervical and lumbosacral transspinal stimulation in healthy humans.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Electrical Stimulation and Motor Function Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Controversies and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Transspinal Magnetic Stimulation: A Critical Review and Exploratory Trial in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Adapting Human-Based Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Develop a Clinically Relevant Animal Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function.PloS one · 2022Article
- Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Neuroplasticity after Repetitive Transspinal Stimulation in Humans.Neural plasticity · 2019Article
- Transspinal stimulation increases motoneuron output of multiple segments in human spinal cord injury.PloS one · 2019Article
- Technological Approaches for Neurorehabilitation: From Robotic Devices to Brain Stimulation and Beyond.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Remodeling Brain Activity by Repetitive Cervicothoracic Transspinal Stimulation after Human Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Paired associative transspinal and transcortical stimulation produces plasticity in human cortical and spinal neuronal circuits.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Transpinal and transcortical stimulation alter corticospinal excitability and increase spinal output.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to establish the neurophysiological properties of the transpinal evoked potentials (TEPs) following transcutaneous electric stimulation of the spine (tsESS) over the cervicothoracic region, changes in the amplitude of the TEPs preceded by median nerve stimulation at group I threshold, and the effects of tsESS on the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) H-reflex in thirteen healthy human subjects while seated. Two re-usable self-adhering electrodes, connected to function as one electrode (cathode), were placed bilaterally on the clavicles. A re-usable electrode (anode) was placed on the cervicothoracic region covering from Cervical 4-Thoracic 2 and held under constant pressure throughout the experiment. TEPs were recorded bilaterally from major arm muscles with subjects seated at stimulation frequencies of 1.0, 0.5, 0.33, 0.2, 0.125, and 0.1 Hz, and upon double tsESS pulses delivered at an inter-stimulus interval of 40 ms. TEPs from the arm muscles were also recorded following median nerve stimulation at the conditioning-test (C-T) intervals of 2, 3, 5, 8, and 10 ms. The FCR H-reflex was evoked and recorded according to conventional methods following double median nerve pulses at 40 ms, and was also conditioned by tsESS at C-T intervals that ranged from -10 to +50 ms. The arm TEPs amplitude was not decreased at low-stimulation frequencies and upon double tsESS pulses in all but one subject. Ipsilateral and contralateral arm TEPs were facilitated following ipsilateral median nerve stimulation, while the FCR H-reflex was depressed by double pulses and following tsESS at short and long C-T intervals. Non-invasive transpinal stimulation can be used as a therapeutic modality to decrease spinal reflex hyper-excitability in neurological disorders and when combined with peripheral nerve stimulation to potentiate spinal output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.